Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: flevit
I do not share your certainty of more than one mass extinction. hydrology, sedimentation, of a liquid catatrophy that large would be tough to predict the outcome, and could form layering that could easily be mistaken as seperate events, not to mention the effect that would do to elements and their decay (un-knowable).

Sorry, geological evidence just doesn't accomodate one mass extinction. The fossils are deposited in multiple strata separated by hundreds of millions of years. Radiometry and sedimentation analysis of the surrounding rocks prove this. One catastrophe could not deposit huge numbers of layers of dirt, instantly condense them to rock, then deposit more layers of dirt that instantly turn into rock, etc. Not to mention that each strata in the column give radiometric dating rates that correspond to gradual accumulation. And the fact that particular fossils are only found in the appropriate strata (no method of deposition can explain that).

259 posted on 11/03/2005 7:15:07 AM PST by Quark2005 (Science aims to elucidate. Pseudoscience aims to obfuscate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: Quark2005

I would dare say you have NO IDEA what a "one catastrophe" could or could not do, one castatrophy, could have many different compositions weather,deluges,respites,deluges, earthquakes,tremors,earthquakes,eruptions,steamvents,respites, repeat. not to mention how this would effect radiometric decay(unknowable pressures,temperatures,leaching,etc..).multiple strata doesn't demand long ages.

fossil fish scream out rapid burial and preservation/hardening, the are preserved with no sign of decay.


264 posted on 11/03/2005 7:57:06 AM PST by flevit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson