Sorry I'm so late to the party. This thread slipped by me.
Are you too steamed to discuss further, or will you play along with some numbers with me ?
I am curious about the overall effects of the FairTax on a nestegg as you describe. I expect have slightly less than $2M, but I don't think the tax percentages will be much different. (Personally, I think one of two things would be fairer than the FairTax as written -- either your plan to spend via PTS from already-taxed savings, or applying a flat-tax to withdrawals from the tax-deferred accounts that are out there and using the revenue to lower the FairTax rate.)
If you'll play along, I'd like to look at the following:
1) What is the total nestegg amount ?
2) What is the portion in tax-deferred accounts ?
3) What is the portion in rental real-estate and how long will it have been held before selling to fund retirement ?
4) What is the portion in after-tax accounts ?
5) What portion is in tax-free bonds ?
6) What "real" rate of return are you expecting in retirement on each portion of the nestegg ?
7) What amount do you expect to consume each year during retirement ?
8) What is the size of the household ? (Not that the prebate amount sounds like it will be important to you.)
Let's reduce the rate of return by inflation to get the "real" rate and hold the consumption amount constant.
It is not enough to look at just one aspect -- the extra FairTax on the money spent from after-tax savings -- because you will lose there. (Sorry Pigdog.)
With the above information, we can see what would happen in the overall picture and compare it to what would happen with the existing system.
If you end up with less retirement buying power under the FairTax, then we'll see how much prices would need to drop to offset that. Then we can talk about whether that is a reasonable expectation or not.
I didn't come to this Fair Tax thread as a "pro" or "con". I came to look at an idea and to give it a fair shake.
A earlier poster brought up the point that the truly wealthy (such as parasites like John Kerry and Teresa Heinz who earned only a minuscule amount of the $500 million they now live on while paying negligible taxes......while calling me "The Rich".......) would finally be forced to pay a meaningful amount of tax. That is something that I would very much like to see.
On the other hand, the thrifty "worker bees" who get stung in the current tax system will get stung twice in the case of the savings they have already paid tax on.
The way I see it, there has to be reasonableness built into any transition and it is not unreasonable to ask that the money earned for X number or years of work not be taxed once with an income tax before being saved and the taxed yet again with a sales tax when it is spent.
As far as assurances from pigdog that it will be a wash because prices will magically drop 28%, sorry, I don't believe in the Easter Bunny.
In regards to my finances, I have always followed a "Millionaire Next Door" lifestyle even though I am a high earner. Even though I am of Baby Boomer age, the fact that I was a Cuban refugee at age 6 in the early 1960's and the fact that everyone in my extended family lost everything the family had ever had and we had to build their fortunes once again from scratch makes me psychologically akin to the Depression era/World War II generation.
With that mindset, once my medical career emerged out of the poverty and hell of pre-med, medical school and post-graduate specialty training, my goals in life were to never have myself or my children financially insecure again and to have zero debt.
Once the money started coming in, my first priority was to pay off the house we live in now and the house I owned as a resident.
After those two goals were accomplished, concentrated on building the nest egg. Medicine is a hellish lifestyle and, after 25 years of it, a retirement at age 55 is something I am looking forward to.
It really does not matter what my particular situation is because not everybody is like me.
Some individuals will swear by real estate and have every last penny in it. I see my overall portfolio as different sacrifices I made in my life or different breaks I got in my life.
My SEP accounts, etc., are breaks. They were places to save untaxed money and, if that money is taxed in the future, that is the way it should be.
My real estate is where I will live until I die (one house on Puget Sound) and what spits out $1,4000 moth in rental income (one house in San Diego, CA). After I am gone, they will belong to my two kids.
The money I have saved outside of retirement accounts and outside of real estate is the money I am most protective of. That is the money I had to save at the cost of conflict with a spoiled-rotten California Baby Boomer wife who believes that Daddy or her husband prints unlimited amounts of money in the basement so she can spend as much as she pleases. (Daddy doesn't have much savings to show for his life's work.)
In an era when the savings rate of most Americans is at rock-bottom, that is the portion of my net worth triad that will dwarf my retirement accounts.
Everybody's case will be different which is exactly why everybody can't be crammed into a one-size-fits-all formula.
My bottom line is that the money that I saved and has already been taxed once ( at the rate of what the gigolo John Kerry calls "the richest 1%" ) not be taxed again when I spend it at retirement at a rate of 28%.
I proposed a simple method of dealing with the double taxation issue.
I see no reason why it can't be adopted by the Fair Tax advocates.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the meantime, the tax-deferred acount will have grown from $1M to $1,276,282. Now I am over 59 1/2 so I use up all of this tax-deferred money. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Then I switch back to the after-tax account and pull $228K/year from it. While I was draining the tax-deferred acounts, this account rose back up to $3,450,000. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So that's what I would expect to happen under the existing Income Tax code. My $4M lasted until I was 95 year old while I spent $190K/year and that was the end of it. What about the FairTax ? Well, Out of my $190K/year spending, there is $20K that is "poverty level spending" for the wife and I. And there is $40K that is spent on education, used goods and travel outside the country. So I'll be paying FairTax on $130K/year, which is $39K. So my total withdrawals from my accounts will need to be $229K. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The calculator I'm using only goes out to 30 years, but you can see I have over $2M still in my account. So let's plug that in and see how long it lasts. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So it looks like I make it another 12 years -- to age 97 rather than the 95 under the existing tax system. I didn't need to have any price drop at all, but I still came out slightly ahead under the FairTax. |