Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Liz

Why don't they leave the poor girl alone???

1) She dresses like a frump.
2) Her husband is a tool.
3) They are both adulterers.
4) I have yet to be convinced that either of them have the brains to come in out of the rain.

Eff 'em... we don't have royalty here. If they want to be fawned all over, they should have stayed home.


3 posted on 11/02/2005 4:22:33 AM PST by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: clee1

LOL Don't hold back, tell us how you really feel!

FWIW, I agree with you. They are both adulterous pigs. Go home.


9 posted on 11/02/2005 4:25:15 AM PST by tuffydoodle (Shut up voices, or I'll poke you with a Q-Tip again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: clee1
Good rant...most excellent..mega kudos.

What brand of coffee are your drinking? I wants to get me some....(g)

26 posted on 11/02/2005 4:32:26 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: clee1

Trying to turn Camilla into Diana is lipstick on a pig. And she's hardly a "girl", however blond she goes. They are both gross, and quite unappealing.


46 posted on 11/02/2005 4:49:29 AM PST by veronica (What will "Ronnie" think? The question that obsesses the internut clowns...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: clee1
Eff 'em... we don't have royalty here. If they want to be fawned all over, they should have stayed home.

USA today reported that 81% of Americans don't care about the visit at all. Royalty is sooo last century. Particularly this particular royal couple. Americans don't like ugly and they don't care for royalty.

64 posted on 11/02/2005 5:08:35 AM PST by freedumb2003 (Let's tear down the observatory so we never get hit by a meteor again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


72 posted on 11/02/2005 5:23:46 AM PST by Mayflower Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: clee1

Eff 'em... we don't have royalty here. If they want to be fawned all over, they should have stayed home.

In England these two live in a castle. In the US these two would live in a trailer park.


147 posted on 11/02/2005 7:40:36 AM PST by DOGEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: clee1

Wait a minute...

her husband is a fool, but that applies to many people.

The only thing I ever admired about that fop Charles was that he was steadfast in his love for the somewhat plain older woman, instead of his glamorous wife.


159 posted on 11/02/2005 8:05:04 AM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: clee1
If they want to be fawned all over, they should have stayed home.

Or be cooler.

192 posted on 11/02/2005 9:08:11 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: clee1

I guess I've never understood the whole "cult of celebrity" thing.

I've got a cousin who subscribes to all those "celebrity magazines," like people and us, and she reads them religiously. She seems to enjoy reading all the fabulous things about all these fabulous people. I just don't get it.

While I don't mind taking an occassional look at Cameron Dias or Brittnay Spears (the fewer the clothes, the better), I really couldn't care less about what's going on in their lives.


And it's even worse with the way people fawn over royalty. I have nothing but the upmost respect for Lady Thatcher, and have developed quite a bit of respect for Tony Blair, since Clinton (sort of) went away... I think that the Queen Mother and Queen Elizabeth both have dignity in public, but I've never really given much thought to either one. I sort of liked that Diana was involved in charities, but I really couldn't give a hoot about the rest of the royals.

Although Prince Charles did sponsor some good charity concerts, as "The Prince's Trust."

Mark


202 posted on 11/02/2005 9:25:37 AM PST by MarkL (I didn't get to where I am today by worrying about what I'd feel like tomorrow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: clee1

You're right on with #1,2 and 4. Out of fairness, though, they are not adulterers now, though they once were. As far as we know, they are only adulterating with each other now. That doesn't change your other points, of course. :-)


260 posted on 11/02/2005 8:50:41 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson