Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: adamsjas
Interestingly enough, Dred Scott is still the law of the land in one respect -- and rightly so. The basic point of that decision was that a "non-person" has no standing to file suit in Federal court, and that remains unchanged even though the determination that a black man was a "non-person" was utterly disgraceful.

A lawyer, for example, cannot file a suit in Federal court on behalf of a dog or cat.

26 posted on 11/02/2005 3:17:20 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

But then, neither a dog nor a cat can be charged with assault or murder. Somehow that principle didn't get transferred over to these non-persons with very much diligence.


29 posted on 11/02/2005 3:44:01 AM PST by The Red Zone (Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson