Skip to comments.
CIA holds terror suspects in secret prisons
WP ^
| November 1 2005
| Dana Priest
Posted on 11/01/2005 9:02:24 PM PST by jmc1969
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
To: jmc1969
Excellent!
No pictures!!!
Semper Fi,
Kelly
21
posted on
11/01/2005 10:18:53 PM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
To: bigeasy_70118
"Would I run a page one story on Dec. 5, 1944 that the allies are invading Normandy tomorrow?" Besides being incorrect about the D-Day date (JUNE 6, 1944) the Poster reveals himself to be badly misinformed and naive about the fundamentals of War. If he thinks WWII was in some way a 'Clean' War, warranting his cooperation and approval because of this impression, he is way out to lunch. WWII (And every other War) was a War and inherently unclean. That is the fundamental characteristic of all Wars. The impression that rules and regulations can somehow cleanse War and thereby make it acceptable is a dangerous delusion.
If this War is less 'Clean' the WWII, it is because of the nature of the enemy we are fighting, not as the poster implies, because of the US's actions.
What a maroon!
22
posted on
11/01/2005 10:20:26 PM PST
by
TCats
To: jmc1969
LOL (have to otherwise I would cry.)
What is wrong with this title, "CIA holds terror suspects in secret prisons"?
Can't figure out what is secret if it's in the newspaper. I really think the CIA needs to be disbanded. Sheesh we're spending billions of dollars on an agency that hires blond bimbos who tell their lovers that they are spies. We have an agency that has no idea who Niger is selling their yellowcake to. We have an agency who allows a third rate former Ambassador to "collect" yellowcake information over tea and then does not file a written report and THEN brazenly lies about the trip in a partisan newspaper that is read the world over and then whines that the his wife who works for the CIA and who recommended him for the job is "outed". This couple then poses for the cover of a silly elitist society magazine called Vanity Fair.
And now the "secret" prisons are all over another newspaper. Well that's serving the public well, a secret service that can't keep secrets. I want my darn money back.
23
posted on
11/01/2005 10:21:29 PM PST
by
Chgogal
(Viva Bush, the real revolutionary. We're winning the WOT in Iraq! Goodbye Che. Hello W!)
To: jmc1969
Joe Wilson! Your next assignment is ready!
To: TCats
The impression that rules and regulations can somehow cleanse War and thereby make it acceptable is a dangerous delusion. If 'twas so, there never should have been the Nuremberg Trials.
25
posted on
11/01/2005 10:22:01 PM PST
by
The Red Zone
(Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
To: jmc1969
As long as Haliburton got the contract to build the prisons it's OK by me!
To: bigeasy_70118
I like to think of the Daily kos..etc as reverse barometers. If they like something it has to be bad
27
posted on
11/01/2005 10:23:30 PM PST
by
Valin
(Purgamentum init, exit purgamentum)
To: Cementjungle
Halliburton didn't; they recycled some old concrete.
28
posted on
11/01/2005 10:24:21 PM PST
by
The Red Zone
(Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
To: The Red Zone
IMO The Nuremberg Trials were as much a political statement as a bona fide trial. They were conducted by the victors against the losers but, in fact, very few War atrocities were ever prosecuted or even followed up on by either side.
I can almost guarantee that had the Nazi's won, summary execution would have ensued and those convicted at Nuremberg would have been awarded the Iron Cross.
29
posted on
11/01/2005 10:28:13 PM PST
by
TCats
To: jmc1969
I would bet anything that Rockefeller is behind this "leak" to grab more impetus for his "Phase 2" intelligence investigation
30
posted on
11/01/2005 10:47:07 PM PST
by
tinamina
To: Certain_Doom
BUMP what you said.
Most Americans couldn't care less about "terror suspects" or what kind of prison they're in or what kind of torture they're enduring (panties on the head, for example). As Dan Rather would say, FEA.
To: jmc1969
We already had an idea that this is what was happening. No reason for them to publish it. We want terrorists locked away. Then again, it will be nice to see the pro-terrorist libs having panic attacks :)
32
posted on
11/01/2005 11:00:54 PM PST
by
Cougar66
(If I wanted a woman to be President, I'd have voted for John Kerry)
To: TCats
33
posted on
11/02/2005 12:29:04 AM PST
by
The Red Zone
(Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
To: jmc1969
"
The CIA Certain Individuals within the CIA and the State Department are willing to leak anything and everything to hurt Bush."
Joe America
34
posted on
11/02/2005 12:35:16 AM PST
by
expatguy
(http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
To: jmc1969
Well, it's nice to see the CIA morphing back into it's old, evil self, in the eyes of the left and MSM. :)
To: jmc1969
Every time they caught one of the higher-ups - they got whisked away - never to be seen again.
Torture? The MSM has consistently spread the story that torture is of no use.....so I'm sure the CIA is also aware of this fact - don't ya think? [wink]
To: jmc1969
The CIA is willing to leak anything and everything to hurt Bush. When did the CIA become anti-American?
37
posted on
11/02/2005 2:47:16 AM PST
by
aculeus
To: AmericaUnited
The top 30 al Qaeda prisoners exist in complete isolation from the outside world. Kept in dark, sometimes underground cells, they have no recognized legal rights, and no one outside the CIA is allowed to talk with or even see them, or to otherwise verify their well-being, said current and former and U.S. and foreign government and intelligence officials.Liberal weenies make me want to puke.
38
posted on
11/02/2005 2:57:08 AM PST
by
Timeout
To: jmc1969
To: jmc1969
CIA holds terror suspects in secret prisons In cells right next to the aliens captured when their spaceships crashed! I read it in the supermarket tabloids ... so it must be true!
40
posted on
11/02/2005 3:06:21 AM PST
by
ExSES
(the "bottom-line")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson