Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Suit targets Altamont wind farms
Contra Costa Times ^ | 11/1/5

Posted on 11/01/2005 3:47:18 PM PST by SmithL

Two environmental groups have gone to court to challenge renewed Alameda County permits for Altamont Pass wind farms, saying more studies are needed on the energy operations' lethal effects on birds.

One of the groups said Monday that interference by Rep. Richard Pombo, R-Tracy, forced them into court action.

Lawsuits by Californians for Renewable Energy and the Golden Gate Audubon Society claim Alameda County supervisors were "arbitrary and capricious" when they approved bird-protection measures in September as conditions of the permits granted to Altamont wind-energy companies.

The regulations were approved despite critics, including the office of California Attorney General Bill Lockyer, who said they didn't go far enough to protect birds, said Michael Boyd, president of the renewable energy group. Recent studies conclude nearly 5,000 birds are killed each year by flying into windmills spinning in the hills east of Livermore. The birds include protected species such as golden eagles, red tail hawks and burrowing owls.

In approving the permits, Boyd said, county supervisors shirked provisions of state's Environmental Quality Act requiring extensive studies on a project's effect on wildlife, the groups claim.

Boyd said that negotiations to settle the dispute over the bird deaths were scuttled by an October 2004 letter from Pombo to U.S. Interior Secretary Gale Norton asking her department to suspend interim guidelines protecting birds in the Altamont.

"It was at that moment that the wind industry started balking at the negotiations," Boyd said.

A spokesman for the House Resources Committee, of which Pombo is the chairman, called the sabotage allegation "preposterous on its face."

"These were interim guidelines, which -- as the term suggests -- had no effect in law or regulation," said Brian Kennedy. He said the changes sought by Pombo related only to new wind energy projects - not the turbines in the Altamont.

But Boyd said it was commonly believed at the time that the guidelines would apply to the Altamont, and that power companies seemed resigned to following them until Pombo's letter.

"He poisoned the will of the wind industry to negotiate a settlement. As a result, we find ourselves in court."

Boyd said there have been no studies on how the Altamont windmills affect birds, because no one suspected such a problem would exist when the wind-energy project was launched in the early 1980s.

He said evidence gathered over the past quarter-century shows that the effects are significant enough to require an impact report, which should have been triggered by September's permit renewals.

"We're not trying to stop the wind turbines from operating," Boyd said. "We're just trying to make them live up to their reputation of providing clean energy. It's not clean energy if it's got the blood of birds all over it."

The lawsuits filed in Alameda County Superior Court would require an immediate impact study to gauge the adequacy of the bird protections.

Nicki Carlsen, a Los Angeles attorney representing wind-power companies in the Altamont, said she believed county officials acted appropriately in approving the 13-year permits.

The permits require the shutdown this month of about 100 windmills deemed to be especially lethal to birds because of their locations.

Also, Altamont companies are being required to replace their windmills gradually over the next 13 years with larger, slower-moving turbines that experts believe will be far less hazardous for birds.

"We believe the county operated within all applicable laws, including (California's environmental law), when it approved the new conditional-use permits," she said.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: attacklawyers; ecoterror; windfarm

1 posted on 11/01/2005 3:47:19 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL


No growth, new age, gaia worshipping retards.

Just too funny !


2 posted on 11/01/2005 3:48:28 PM PST by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

They won't be happy til we're living in caves. Even then they'll complain about the smoke from the camp fires.


3 posted on 11/01/2005 3:49:13 PM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

One of the groups said Monday that interference by Rep. Richard Pombo, R-Tracy, forced them into court action.

So what will make them happy?????????


4 posted on 11/01/2005 3:49:21 PM PST by PeterPrinciple (Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Isn't this the same bunch of troublemaking hypocritical libs that constantly drone on about ALTERNATIVE POWER SOURCES??? The mindless hypocrisy is beyond belief.


5 posted on 11/01/2005 3:49:22 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Yet more proof that the destruction of the US economy is the ultimate goal of the environmentalists communists.
6 posted on 11/01/2005 3:53:42 PM PST by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Watermelons. Stinking watermelons.


7 posted on 11/01/2005 3:55:52 PM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

indeed...

They have absolutly no shame. THey want to have their cake and eat it too.

Skip the wind farms and lets get back to good old nuclear power. Safe, clean, and will make electricity "too cheap to meter" LOL


8 posted on 11/01/2005 3:57:37 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Funny how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

These people use electricity every minute of every day just like the rest of us while they rabidly oppose any means of generating it. The word 'hypocrite' comes to mind.


9 posted on 11/01/2005 4:05:42 PM PST by KarinG1 (Some of us are trying to engage in philosophical discourse. Please don't allow us to interrupt you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Recent studies conclude nearly 5,000 birds are killed each year by flying into windmills

Sounds like it might be nice to live around one of these windfarms. Wouldn't have all of these birds trying to build nests in your attic or crapping all over your car.

10 posted on 11/01/2005 4:08:57 PM PST by Brett66 (Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Why don't they focus their "Save the Bird" efforts on finding a cure for the bird flu?


11 posted on 11/01/2005 4:10:00 PM PST by CheneyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This is an important reminder to anyone paying attention that "environmentalists" hate wind energy.

They only support wind energy if you are planning a gas-fired power plant, or a coal-fired power plant, or a nuclear power plant. If that is your plan, they will trot out wind energy as an alternative.

But if you are actually planning a wind farm, they will oppose it each and every time.


12 posted on 11/01/2005 4:10:17 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Apparently, the only "wind power" these folks tolerate is from their "intellectual" flatulence! Cronkite, Kennedy, et al, are opposing wind farms off either Martha's Vineyard or Nantucket. Whatever the ostensible reason, it's really because the farm will spoil their view.


13 posted on 11/01/2005 4:39:03 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

>> So what will make them happy?????????

The extermination of humanity.


14 posted on 11/01/2005 4:39:15 PM PST by mmercier (same as it ever was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KarinG1
These people use electricity every minute of every day just like the rest of us while they rabidly oppose any means of generating it. The word 'hypocrite' nut comes to mind.

There. I fixed it.

15 posted on 11/01/2005 5:38:41 PM PST by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Altamont companies are being required to replace their windmills gradually over the next 13 years with larger, slower-moving turbines that experts believe will be far less hazardous for birds.

That might work for the Swifts and the Ducks but what about those Burrowing Owls?

16 posted on 11/01/2005 5:58:56 PM PST by Old Professer (Fix the problem, not the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Even then they'll complain about the smoke from the camp fires.

Too late! Central California To Ban Fireplaces

17 posted on 11/02/2005 6:18:06 AM PST by Clovis_Skeptic (Islam is a religion of peace my as@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marron
This is an important reminder to anyone paying attention that "environmentalists" hate wind energy.

I believe they will oppose anything that would threaten their industry. Without a cause, they don't exist!

18 posted on 11/02/2005 6:20:27 AM PST by Clovis_Skeptic (Islam is a religion of peace my as@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson