Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Republican Oxley may retire - sources
Reuters ^ | 10/31/05

Posted on 10/31/2005 7:03:52 PM PST by nypokerface

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The chairman of the U.S. House Financial Services Committee, Ohio Republican Rep. Michael Oxley, could announce his retirement as early as Tuesday, sources close to the congressman said on Monday.

Oxley's spokeswoman did not return calls for comment.

Oxley most recently shepherded a bill through the House of Representatives to overhaul regulation of mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The bill must still clear the Senate, which is unlikely this year.

Despite Congress being in session, Oxley has events scheduled in his home state on Tuesday.

"There could be an announcement tomorrow in Ohio," said one source.

But other sources close to the congressman said he might also make the announcement from Washington on Wednesday.

Oxley, 61, entered Congress representing his Ohio district in 1981.

He co-authored the 2002 post-Enron corporate reform law that is commonly referred to as Sarbanes-Oxley.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 109th; michaeloxley; retirement

1 posted on 10/31/2005 7:03:54 PM PST by nypokerface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Will he finish the current term?


2 posted on 10/31/2005 7:06:22 PM PST by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface; RockinRight; TonyRo76; Columbus Dawg; conservative_2001; fieldmarshaldj; ...

OK, Buckeye State Freepers, who'll run to succeed him?


3 posted on 10/31/2005 7:06:31 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Sam Alito Deserves To Be Confirmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I don't know. The 4th district isn't my part of the state.

4 posted on 10/31/2005 7:07:48 PM PST by NeoCaveman (Confirm Judge Alito now. Yes I am an Alitist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Hold on second, I'll go ask him.


5 posted on 10/31/2005 7:09:40 PM PST by nypokerface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

In 2004 Oxley got 58.60% to 41.4% for the Dem.


6 posted on 10/31/2005 7:10:24 PM PST by NeoCaveman (Confirm Judge Alito now. Yes I am an Alitist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I'm in district 7....


7 posted on 10/31/2005 7:11:22 PM PST by MikefromOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Hitlery still flashing those FBI files around?


8 posted on 10/31/2005 7:43:30 PM PST by Liberty Wins (Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Gee, is it a coincidence that both Michael Oxley and Paul Sarbanes both chose to retire in the same year, the year that corporations are required to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act?

-PJ

9 posted on 10/31/2005 8:03:23 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
That "act" has been nothing but a disaster. It creates tons or paper but still doesn't not really make the situation any better. At the financial institution I work at we refer to Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) as the "Accounts and Consultants Full Employment Act of 2002"

More gubment regulatory BS!
10 posted on 10/31/2005 8:18:34 PM PST by Drill Thrawl (...and then the cops came!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Drill Thrawl

No surprise then, just another useless law with unintended consequences!


11 posted on 11/01/2005 5:54:58 AM PST by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Had they been trying to come up with a bill to stifle innovation, kill telecommuting and other modern work style initiatives, and guarantee perpetual employment for big accounting/consulting firms, they couldn't have done much better than the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation. It's a classic example of Congress jumping in with both elbows and completely missing the intended target.
12 posted on 11/01/2005 6:02:31 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves (Speaking several languages is an asset; keeping your mouth shut in one is priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I don't know who'll run, but his district is just as safely Republican as the district that Portman vacated and brought about that uncomfortably close special election. I would prefer if Oxley served out his term and that the open-seat race takes place in the general election in November of 2006,, when we'll have much higher turnout.


13 posted on 11/01/2005 6:52:59 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (http://auh2orepublican.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
per Fox News:Rep. Oxley To Retire in '06
14 posted on 11/01/2005 11:44:41 AM PST by lunarbicep (A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves – Edward R. Murrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson