Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AFPhys
Now let's see if Specter supports this choice. If not, there is BIG TIME trouble. Right now, it is almost ALL about Specter.

In his own mind, sure. And he does hold an influential role, but not the only influential role.

131 posted on 10/31/2005 3:41:49 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Whether WE like it or not, if Specter nixes a judicial nominee, that person WILL be defeated.

McLame, Chaffee, Warner, Collins and Snowe WILL join him.

Result: 49-51 against.

Only the earlier (apparent) "deal" by the President and Frist that kept him in charge of the judiciary committee has kept him on board. Now that Miers has been denied her "up-or-down" vote, he can justifiably make the case that a nominee is not necessarily entitled to a vote.

I wasn't really crazy about Miers, but denying her a vote was a disaster in the making for sometime in the future.


244 posted on 10/31/2005 4:04:23 AM PST by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson