First of all, they're cans, not bottles, so you can't just 'peel off the label. But to do so, would be truly disrespectful of the charity provided by Anheuser-Busch.
"Notice us and our charity, but we have torn off the name from the donor who actually gave this water because we don't like them and we'll just take the credit for the gift."
I don't think they'd be that tacky and selfish, do you?
"First of all, they're cans, not bottles, so you can't just 'peel off the label."
My mistake. Anyways, wasn't it a little tacky of the beer company to give these cans to SBC, a group known for its anti-alcohol stance? I don't know if they accepted them (wouldn't make much sense if they did) or if they were just dropped off at their doorstep, but either way the media is making too much of a big deal over something minor.
No, they're even worse. They're so self centered and egotistical, they prefer people suffer then take the cans from that unclean alcohol company. /sarcasm