Meaning it's still an advertisement for the beer company. Look, this is a dumb argument when nothing bad happened to begin with. SBC had plenty of water to give out, they didn't hand out a particular drinking water made by a beer company, people still got their water, the media made a big deal over it, and some of you are falling for the spin. This isn't a matter of whether or not you agree with their stance on alcohol (I don't, by the way), it's just some reporters making a big deal about nothing and people getting mad at the Southern Baptists for no reason (just what the news people intended). It's within their right to not hand out Anheuser-Busch's water despite whether or not you agree with their moral stance on alcohol. No reason to criticize them or argue with each other over something trivial.
No, I think they gave Jesus Christ a black eye.
By the way what's a fire "figher"?
It's not about alcohol, because there's no alcohol involved. This is roughly equivalent to the British workplaces that banned Piglet stuffed animals--not an actual pork product, and certainly no requirement that anyone be required to use pork products or handle them or be near them.
Just the fetish about the idea of a pig.
That's all.
There's a reason for this non story making news. Did you notice how the RC just happened to be mentioned. The Southern Baptist are taking in the donations the RC needs to pay it's ceo's salaries. They need to taint the competition,I'm sure we'll be hearing about the SA to.