Posted on 10/30/2005 9:10:08 PM PST by Between the Lines
I asked you actually name ONE THIRSTY PERSON denied water by the Baptists. You obviously cannot.
Therefore, your statement is utter BS.
I'll have to disagree on that last point.
You should have read the statement a little more closely before you let your umbrage hijack your typing fingers. I never said the people were thirsty because the SBC refused to give out the A-B provided water, I said the SBC were keeping it away from thirsty people, which they were. It's nice that they had some SBC Religiously Unobjectionable water to hand out, but the question remains, what would they have done if that water had run out?
I suppose the paucity of reports of Baptist artillery fire destroying the tainted water are a good sign, but you really can't trust the MSM, can you?
You stated that the Baptists were keeping water away from thirsty people.
They weren't.
Hurricane 2005 Response-Day 67
Activity Totals (as of 10/27)
|
State Conventions Activated |
41 |
|
Volunteer Days Contributed |
118,513 |
|
Meals Prepared |
9,638,835 |
|
Jobs Completed (cleanup and recovery operations) |
13,961 |
|
Showers Provided |
68,473 |
|
Laundry Loads Completed |
15,964 |
|
Children Cared For |
7,526 |
|
Messages Sent |
3,056 |
|
Gallons of Water Purified |
9,295 |
If the SBC folks were keeping people from drinking,say, bacterially contaminated water, I'd be on their side. However, I don't believe that water provided by A-B is ipso facto contaminated.
Well, that isn't my point.
No thirsty person is being denied water--or having water withheld from them -- by anyone in the SBC.
Your post, and the article, implied otherwise.
I object to (what appears to me to be), mindless discrimination against good works of another. "Well, they're not the right sort of people to be helping."
As I noted before, I cannot see a difference between this and Muslim countries refusing aid from Israel.
Southern Baptists believe that drinking alcohol is a sin.
Therefore, they believe that anything associated with the consumption of alcohol is sinful. They did not want to be party to distributing containers of water with the logo of a beer company on them, therefore tacitly endorsing the main product of the company: alcohol.
The SBC did not want to be party to giving the Anheiser Busch corporation free advertising.
As long as no one was denied water, I have no problem with it, and cannot fathom why anyone else would.
I can see how having to receive the water with the alcohol mfg logo on it could cause a dilemma for the SBs. I find it interesting also that they are called to witness to the distributer as well as the recipient.
I said "might."
... interfere with helping the needy.
Naaaaaa........
Just because they pass over some bottles so they can hand out others doesn't mean they hate anyone.
They just don't want to be seen as endorsing what they consider to be a sinful activity.
This is why I tell these sorts of people my favorite Bible verse is Genesis 27:11.
Ridiculous.
Not really.
I can see their point.
I dread the disaster for which the SBC joins forces with PETA.
That would be fireworks.
Every Baptist I know loves hot dogs, hamburgers and think juicy steaks.
Well, most of the devout Baptists I know refrain from liquor entirely.
But, more than a few who warm a pew every Sunday pop a brew now and then, I am sure.
Man, that almost rhymes.
Before my wife lost her mind and married me, she used to date the older son of a very strict Methodist family in the Midwest. She was objectionable to his parents on religious grounds -- she wasn't Methodist -- and because she used stimulants, which they defined as coffee and Coca-Cola. Forget about beer!
I realize not all Methodists hold to these precepts, but I believe not all varieties of Baptist insist on abstinence.
Then I see no reason why the RC volunteers cannot pass out the water.
Did the new words serve the nation well? Then maybe some good came out of the drinking song, no?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.