[Gumlegs]

Gum: "The "good work" in question being their determination to keep water away from thirsty people because the SBC doesn't approve of who donated the water."

I asked you actually name ONE THIRSTY PERSON denied water by the Baptists. You obviously cannot.

Therefore, your statement is utter BS.

I'll have to disagree on that last point.

You should have read the statement a little more closely before you let your umbrage hijack your typing fingers. I never said the people were thirsty because the SBC refused to give out the A-B provided water, I said the SBC were keeping it away from thirsty people, which they were. It's nice that they had some SBC Religiously Unobjectionable water to hand out, but the question remains, what would they have done if that water had run out?

I suppose the paucity of reports of Baptist artillery fire destroying the tainted water are a good sign, but you really can't trust the MSM, can you?

[Skooz]

You stated that the Baptists were keeping water away from thirsty people.

They weren't.