Replies

Wasn't the Washington Post part of that lawsuit against Free Republic? And if they were, shouldn't they have mentioned that in the interests of good journalism?

Bias that leap outs immediately:

Calling Freepers "War Supporters"...we didn't want war, but Iraq invaded our ally, Kuwait, and supported 9/11 terrorists, that's how it all started. No FReepers support war in and of itself. They could say "Anti-Saddam protestors," "US Foreign Policy Supporters," "Iraq Constitution Supporters" or even the ironic "UN Resolution Supporters!" They didn't even say "Iraq War Supporters."

Saying only the pro American side shoves or crosses the street to the other side. That was laughable.

Not explaining the obvious "anti-war" links to Communism and especially that of Code Pink. Can't they type "Code Pink" and "communist" into a search engine? Is that too hard for the intrepid reporters at the Post?

Ignoring the flag draped coffins and extreme signs the "anti-war" stopped using. Why did they stop? Why do they now quit before 9:00 pm to avoid the soldier's bus?

The article is full of "sly" digs and does smack of a hit piece but they were a little too obvious. Discerning readers will know what this proven liberal media organ is up to. Many readers will go to FreeRepublic.com and find out the facts.

Olds Media displays stunning ignorance yet again:

More often than not, Murphy said, soldiers at Walter Reed, their relatives and hospital personnel have said, "'Thanks for being here.' That's why we come back here. That's why we can take the risk of offending. They want the war to end, and they want the wounded to be taken care of."

Then why does Murphy now disperse her Code Pinkos before the vet bus returns on schedule to cheer the FReeper side and give the finger^TM to the Code Pinko side more often than not?

BTW anybody see any pics posted of Sheehan getting FReeped along with Murphy?