Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Ship In N. Korea (USS Pueblo) Get Her Back
The Washington Times ^ | 10/29/05 | Andrew Salmon

Posted on 10/29/2005 7:35:16 PM PDT by takbodan

PYONGYANG, North Korea -- In the center of the North Korean capital floats a commissioned vessel of the U.S. Navy. The USS Pueblo, a spy ship captured by the North in 1968, is moored on a bank of the Daedong River. Despite quiet U.S. moves in recent years to secure its return, the vessel still functions as tourist attraction, trophy and symbol of anti-American struggle.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: northkorea; usn; usspueblo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
This ship should be taken back or blown to smithereens.
1 posted on 10/29/2005 7:35:17 PM PDT by takbodan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: takbodan

A horrible symbol of America.

Taken from the US under JBJ and sitting in a N. Korean harbor eight years under Clinton.

What a Shame.


2 posted on 10/29/2005 7:39:03 PM PDT by H. Paul Pressler IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takbodan

I was just going to say, drop a cople JDAM's on her and play taps. The honorable way to go! Not in the hands of the enemy!

"NEVER GIVE UP THE SHIP!"


3 posted on 10/29/2005 7:39:22 PM PDT by Danae (Most Liberals don't drink the Kool-aide, they are licking the powder right out of the packet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takbodan

No more food or aid until this ship is returned.


4 posted on 10/29/2005 7:40:39 PM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takbodan

I read that the ship was moored at Wonsan, on the east coast, from 1968 until the late 1990's, when it was disguised as a freighter and moved to the west coast so it could be put on display near the capital. Given our surveillance capabilities, it's amazing that they could have pulled this off--but remember, this happened during Clinton's presidency.


5 posted on 10/29/2005 7:47:11 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takbodan; ASA Vet; Grampa Dave
a symbol of the anti-American struggle piracy on the high seas"


Actually, Pueblo could still serve as a target beacon.
6 posted on 10/29/2005 7:48:45 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (I once opposed keelhauling but recently have come to my senses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takbodan

Its probably the most modern ship in their Navy.


7 posted on 10/29/2005 7:52:23 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takbodan

Would be interesting way to start a war - give them an untimatum, then just go in and take it, accidentally taking the capital along the way for "security perimeter".

Only half kidding.


8 posted on 10/29/2005 7:57:06 PM PDT by Mr. Rational (God gave me a brain and expects me to use it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae
I was just going to say, drop a cople JDAM's on her and play taps. The honorable way to go! Not in the hands of the enemy!

Back in '68, I was arguing that we should destroy the ship if we couldn't get it back--as we did with the frigate USS Philadelphia in 1804, following its capture by Tripolitan pirates.

9 posted on 10/29/2005 7:57:23 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: takbodan

Take her out to some pinch point and scuttle 'er.


10 posted on 10/29/2005 7:58:34 PM PDT by Paladin2 (If the political indictment is from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: H. Paul Pressler IV
Putting quite a bit of spin on that one.

sitting in a N. Korean harbor eight years under Clinton.

Since the Pueblo was seized in an act of piracy, the Dems held power for 13 years, the Repubs for 24.

Your statement makes as much sense as saying 'eight years under Reagan', or 'almost 5 years under GWB'.

11 posted on 10/29/2005 7:59:46 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Danae

They were not supposed to give up the ship.


12 posted on 10/29/2005 8:00:50 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: H. Paul Pressler IV

Not a Clinton fan, but it wasn't like Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush 41, or Bush 43 have done anything either.


13 posted on 10/29/2005 8:02:05 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Yeah, but lets wait until that little dog-eating, Liberace-wig and high heel wearing pudgy troll visits the ship.


14 posted on 10/29/2005 8:02:43 PM PDT by Brofholdonow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

Neither are we.

Time to put her out of her misery and freak out lil'Kim with the precision munition as well. Might push the little bastard over the edge though, if he hasn't already gone over that is...


15 posted on 10/29/2005 8:04:01 PM PDT by Danae (Most Liberals don't drink the Kool-aide, they are licking the powder right out of the packet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: H. Paul Pressler IV

Do you mean under LBJ?


16 posted on 10/29/2005 8:04:32 PM PDT by AmericaUnite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: takbodan

NKorea ain't gonna give her up.

BTW did you know that her capture declassified what we now know as GPS?

Only 12 "birds' back then and known as SatNav.


17 posted on 10/29/2005 8:05:51 PM PDT by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

"They were not supposed to give up the ship."

Huh? Are you aware of the circumstances?


18 posted on 10/29/2005 8:08:56 PM PDT by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bobibutu

Yep....


19 posted on 10/29/2005 8:10:16 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

Really? Then why this as an outcome?

"A naval inquiry into the Pueblo incident led to no apparent disciplinary action for Bucher or any of his men."


20 posted on 10/29/2005 8:15:00 PM PDT by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson