Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam the Sham
You live in a nation, not a market. I agree, and stated that in my post #77.

The economy serves humans, not the other way around. There is no ethical or moral reason to accept the model of globalism we are being shown.

None of the posts on this thread, including yours, have shown any understanding of what that model is.

I certainly did not address that model either. You are arguing against a straw man. You are asking for defense of something I have not said.

LIt is a model that puts shareholder equity as the one and only consideration.

There you go: who on earth (but the socialists) have told you that nonsense?

have You can whine

Now, my friend you are being unjustifiably offensive: I did not complain about anything. True, I called others whiners, so you appear to use schoolyard tools of debate.

"socialist" all you like. But you will be simply an update of 1935 Liberty League types.

Silly. You know nothing about my position: except for #77, I provided counter-arguments against other posts. You simply have no data to put me in any particular category. Once again you are accusing me of something I never said. No comment is therefore necessary or possible.

83 posted on 10/29/2005 11:39:05 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: TopQuark

You have defined the market as the focus of conservatism. It is not. Faith, family, and community are the focus of conservatism, not a Social Darwinist "devil take the hindmost" indifference to any consideration but shareholder equity.


84 posted on 10/29/2005 11:44:58 AM PDT by Sam the Sham (A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson