To: Liz
It is Cheney they are angling for and they just may get him.
8 posted on
10/29/2005 6:17:37 AM PDT by
cynicom
To: cynicom
Not really. It's the President himself. Conyers just spilled the beans on Fox just now. He didn't use the word "impeach" but when he said that it seems likely that the President is involved in this, you know that is what he--and the rest of his pack of rats--have in mind.
11 posted on
10/29/2005 6:21:23 AM PDT by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
To: cynicom
It is Cheney they are angling for and they just may get him. Libby would have to say "Cheney told me to shop Plame to reporters" whereas his current defense is either he forgot about being told by other officials (including Cheney) or the reporters are lying and actually told him. Even if he says Cheney told him and gets Cheney on the stand, I don't see how that hurts Cheney unless he draws Cheney in as part of a conspiracy. OTOH, the public damage from media spin following Cheney's testimony could be severe.
14 posted on
10/29/2005 6:24:27 AM PDT by
palmer
(Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
To: cynicom
So why did Cheney want him? Why did Cheney put another traitor on his staff, the wife of James Carville?
This is a RINO administration.
31 posted on
10/29/2005 6:42:42 AM PDT by
sine_nomine
(Every baby is a blessing from God, from the moment of conception.)
To: cynicom
It is Cheney they are angling for and they just may get him.I think you're basically right but I wonder why- it's not as if he's likely to run for another office.
76 posted on
10/29/2005 8:20:19 AM PDT by
mafree
To: cynicom
They are angling for an old Vice President and a lame duck President.
We will still be here--stronger than ever--while the MSM gets weaker and weaker.
I like our long term prospects as long as we remember that our loyalty lies to principles and not people.
77 posted on
10/29/2005 8:22:59 AM PDT by
cgbg
(Boxer and Feinstein confuse the constitution with Mao's Little Red Book.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson