Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cynicom

Not really. It's the President himself. Conyers just spilled the beans on Fox just now. He didn't use the word "impeach" but when he said that it seems likely that the President is involved in this, you know that is what he--and the rest of his pack of rats--have in mind.


11 posted on 10/29/2005 6:21:23 AM PDT by MizSterious (Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious
He didn't use the word "impeach" but when he said that it seems likely that the President is involved in this, you know that is what he--and the rest of his pack of rats--have in mind.

I saw that.

Conyers seemed rather subdued, unlike his wild-eyed, wound a little too tight, ranting style.

What a statesman. Must have been up late last night celebrating.

18 posted on 10/29/2005 6:27:16 AM PDT by woofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious
You have to be patient....Bush may be in their minds but first things first. Cheney has to go. Remember, they got Agnew FIRST and then Nixon. They have three long years to work their evil. If they got Bush tomorrow, Cheney would be in charge and he is more conservative than Bush ever was or will be.

Who are they??? Well the out front people for "they" getting Nixon were Hillary Clinton and Sandy Berger.

20 posted on 10/29/2005 6:28:40 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious
Your right, this has been going on in one way or another ever since President Bush took office.

They have all these commissions and for what, it doesn't matter what comes out of them, nothing ever happens. Its just another way of giving a "crony" a job and make it look like they are doing something important.

23 posted on 10/29/2005 6:31:20 AM PDT by depenzz (My tastes are simple, I 'm always satisfied by the best)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious

"President is involved in this"

The President is involved in WHAT??? There is no crime!!! Except for the lying of ONE individual, there is no crime!!! Even many in the press acknowledge this...NO CRIME!!!!
Come on, Bush. Pick a supreme court nominee so they'll move on to something else.


71 posted on 10/29/2005 8:01:26 AM PDT by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious

"impeach"


Rush has been talking about this ever since Bush was re-elected. That's why lately the dems have been using terms like "this is worse than watergate". This theme of "lying to get us into the war" has been the theme.

And .. this is why the dems have been after Rove - because Rove is the president's right hand man - and if Rove is dirty it's not too large a leap to connection Rove to the President.

But .. like Rush has been saying .. this is not the 1970's and the media does not have the power it did then. Also, there was a democrat congress in the 70's, and it was easy to intimidate Nixon into thinking they could impeach him - because there were enough dems to do it. That's no longer the case. There are many, many dems who I do not believe would vote for impeachment - and NO REPUBLICAN WITH ANY SENSE WOULD EITHER.

Those facts make it impossible to impeach Bush - but saying those things must make the dems feel better or more powerful or something. When, in reality, it just makes them sound stupid.


115 posted on 10/29/2005 10:58:12 AM PDT by CyberAnt (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson