If that's the case, why did Fitzgerald go out of his way yesterday to stress that his case should not be used by critics of the Iraq war for their own political purposes. Face it, this prosecutor is about as good as they get when it comes to fairness, which is why he was chosen in the first place and why the White House is not going on attack.
Enough of that hogwash already!
Fitzgerald is "good as they get" at spending your tax money. Were he not he would have disbanded the "investigation" within two months, after determining that there was no crimes committed, as Valerie Plame was not a "covert" CIA operative and had not met the definition of the disclosure law in question.
Instead, the "good as they get" prosecutor spent countless dollars and over two years for what, they would have you believe, was a grand investigation of serious national consequences.
This "investigation" is, and always has been, about destroying the Republican administration. [reads ... coup] It is about President Bush lying about facts to go to war.
VP Cheney will be next on the hit list and when that comes the coup will have been successful.
Why did he go out of his way to accuse Libby of a crime he wasn't charged with? Why did he go out of his way to not say if Plame was covert? And why did he not clear the names of the rest of the people he hauled into his inquisition?