Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billclintonwillrotinhell
If that's the case, why did Fitzgerald go out of his way yesterday to stress that his case should not be used by critics of the Iraq war for their own political purposes.

Why did he go out of his way to accuse Libby of a crime he wasn't charged with? Why did he go out of his way to not say if Plame was covert? And why did he not clear the names of the rest of the people he hauled into his inquisition?

123 posted on 10/29/2005 6:03:10 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: pepperhead
Why did he go out of his way to accuse Libby of a crime he wasn't charged with?

I never heard him do that. He may have said it was classified info, but there's apparently not a criminal charge that covers that. That's what I understood from the presser, anyway.

Why did he go out of his way to not say if Plame was covert? And why did he not clear the names of the rest of the people he hauled into his inquisition?

The covert issue is a good question, but that still wouldn't excuse anybody from committing perjury or obstructing justice in the investigation. He's not going to clear anybody while the investigation is still open.

193 posted on 10/29/2005 11:50:39 PM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson