Posted on 10/29/2005 1:36:18 AM PDT by JTN
Some of the anti-pot propaganda has been to claim that marijuana is actually more likely to cause cancer than cigarettes. Perhaps this study will help put that to rest.
ping
Yeah, but what about the gunshot wounds? I've seen the movie 'Reefer Madness' more than once, so I am well aware of exactly how dangerous this drug really is.
You're right--I used to be a tobacco addict, & I quit almost 3 yrs ago (THANK GOD!). When I smoked cigarettes, I averaged about 25 cigarettes a day...& if 2 hours went by & I didn't light up again, my body wouldn't let me ignore the suffering I went through, either.
On the other hand, I enjoy smoking marijuana, & when I do, I will smoke about 1/2 a joint, just enough to get a decent buzz. I'll put it out & smoke the rest of it much later, oftentimes the next day. No addiction, no fuss.
Smokers who get lung cancer usually smoke for at least 20 years a pack a day.
Nobody can smoke that much pot and still function.
Hmmmmmmm...I never knew marijuana would cause that to happen to anyone. I've enjoyed smoking marijuana for 28 years, & NOT ONCE have I ever come across a situation where vioence occurred.
Could it be that the marijuana laws themselves were respomsible for creating such violence?
ping
You're right.. It just makes you lazy & stupid.
..and I speak from experience as well.. I smoked it from about 1972 through the early 1990's.
Well that's pretty what I said in my original comment on the article, but that is just one more reason that cancer has not been observed to be more common in chronic cannabis smokers.
Cute. I've never seen reefer madness, but I've heard that it's hilarious.
It isn't the drug, dude...
Remember, never feed a troll.
This article is very misleading and a good example of why a lot of these so called Public Health articles are BS. I work in this field, and I can tell you anecdotally at least (and we are talking thousands of cases I've reviewed) that although pot smokers don't seem to have an increased risk of lung cancer, they do seem to have very high rates of head and neck cancers. These cases usually involve men in their 40s-60s, and most of the ones I've seen also smoke tobacco. Also, epidemiologically speaking they do not have a method in the cancer case reporting programs to record whether or not a person smokes pot. We do collect tobacco and alcohol information, and in the military and VA hospitals Agent orange, Asbestos and Chemical Exposure information is collected as well. THERE IS NO ONE on a national, sustained basis collecting information on mariuuana smokers and cancer.
LOL!
When I was in High School, I knew a few guys who TRIED!
I really thought the part where the guy plays the piano in a REALLY maniacal way, looking back over his shoulder was the funniest damn thing...wish I had a little animated GIF of that!
Dude, yes it is.
Or at least, in many cases it is. This is my opinion after about 30 years of being around pot smokers and being one myself.
Also, it's a matter of degree. I know of many folks that smoke daily and still lead productive lives. But I believe those to be in the minority. Many more I know are in their 40's and still live with their parents or can't hold a job etc.
Then there are ones like me that wake up one day and realize that they've spent the first half of their adult lives in a haze of pot smoke and are nowhere near where they want to be in life because of it.
But I'm feeling much better now...
The U.S. federal government spent over $19 billion dollars in 2003 on the War on Drugs, at a rate of about $600 per second. The budget has since been increased by over a billion dollars.
In 2002, 45.3 percent of the 1,538,813 total arrests for drug abuse violations were for marijuana -- a total of 697,082. Of those, 613,986 people were arrested for marijuana possession alone. This is a slight decrease from 2000, when a total of 734,497 Americans were arrested for marijuana offenses, of which 646,042 were for possession alone.
In 2004, 44.2 percent of the 1,745,712 total arrests in the US for
drug abuse violations were for marijuana -- a total of 771,605.
Of those, 684,319 people were arrested for possession alone.
By contrast in 2000, a total of 734,497 Americans were arrested for
marijuana offenses, of which 646,042 were for possession alone.
Marijuana Arrests and Total Drug Arrests in the US
Year Total Drug Arrests Total MJ Arrests
2004 1,745,712 771,605
2003 1,678,192 755,186
2002 1,538,813 697,082
2001 1,586,902 723,628
2000 1,579,566 734,497
1999 1,532,200 704,812
1998 1,559,100 682,885
1997 1,583,600 695,201
1996 1,506,200 641,642
1995 1,476,100 588,964
1990 1,089,500 326,850
1980 580,900 401,982
Year MJ Trafficking/Sale Arrests MJ Possession Arrests
2004 87,286 684,319
2003 92,300 662,886
2002 83,096 613,986
2001 82,519 641,109
2000 88,455 646,042
1999 84,271 620,541
1998 84,191 598,694
1997 88,682 606,519
1996 94,891 546,751
1995 85,614 503,350
1990 66,460 260,390
1980 63,318 338,664
Year Total Violent Crime Arrests Total Property Crime Arrests
2004 590,258 1,649,825
2003 597,026 1,605,127
2002 620,510 1,613,954
2001 627,132 1,618,465
2000 625,132 1,620,928
1999 644,770 1,676,100
1998 675,900 1,805,600
1997 717,750 2,015,600
1996 729,900 2,045,600
1995 796,250 2,128,600
Sources: Crime in the United States: FBI Uniform Crime Reports 2004
(Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2005),
Uh....that's kinda part of the point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.