To: bill1952
I'm familiar with the idea of paternity fraud, and while I realize that there are no guarantees (particularly in states where any children of a marriage are legally assumed to be the offspring of the husband), a vasectomy and remaining faithful to any hypothetical Mrs Slings and Arrows should minimize (albeit not eliminate) my risk.
50 posted on
10/28/2005 6:46:07 PM PDT by
Slings and Arrows
(Texas State Motto: "Regular or Extra-Crispy?")
To: Slings and Arrows
Well, you got me there.
A vascetomy should do the trick. *Shudder*
54 posted on
10/28/2005 6:54:51 PM PDT by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: Slings and Arrows
I'm familiar with the idea of paternity fraud Hasn't technology advanced to the point where paternity fraud is no long possible unless enabled by idiot courts (e.g., NJ)?
74 posted on
10/28/2005 7:12:43 PM PDT by
cynwoody
To: Slings and Arrows
I'm familiar with the idea of paternity fraud, and while I realize that there are no guarantees (particularly in states where any children of a marriage are legally assumed to be the offspring of the husband), a vasectomy and remaining faithful to any hypothetical Mrs Slings and Arrows should minimize (albeit not eliminate) my risk.I was once threatened by just this sort of thing, and I had to remind the former girlfriend (and evil b***h from hell) that we had never had sex!
Mark
107 posted on
10/29/2005 1:30:44 AM PDT by
MarkL
(I didn't get to where I am today by worrying about what I'd feel like tomorrow!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson