Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: Crackingham
Punish businesses that prosper.
That's the logic from Judd Gregg (RINO)
2 posted on
10/28/2005 3:22:42 PM PDT by
RWR8189
(George Allen 2008)
To: Crackingham
You can say all you want Gregg. You will never get any tax hike thru the US House.
3 posted on
10/28/2005 3:22:51 PM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(I'll try to be NICER, if you will try to be SMARTER!.......Water Buckets UP!)
To: Crackingham
Judd Gregg? Why doesn't he just give his $350 million Powerball lottery winnings to the poor, to help pay their heating bills, instead of advocating tired, old Carter lunacies?
To: Crackingham
Maybe we should set some price controls too Mr. Gregg?
It worked so well in the 70s and 80s...
5 posted on
10/28/2005 3:23:49 PM PDT by
RWR8189
(George Allen 2008)
To: Crackingham
The oil companies are going to need those profits to bring new wells and refineries on line.
If not oil prices are really going to go through the roof.
You'd think a Republican could understand simple economics.
6 posted on
10/28/2005 3:24:12 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: Crackingham
those in our society struggling to heat their homes are being left in the cold by oil companies Alaska has a program or two to help those with the proper welfare recipient creds to pay for heating their hovels. Should this become a FedGov responsibility? Why not. The states are still alive and twitching now and then.
8 posted on
10/28/2005 3:28:04 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Crackingham
10 posted on
10/28/2005 3:29:04 PM PDT by
SmithL
(There are a lot of people that hate Bush more than they hate terrorists)
To: Crackingham
How the hell can you be a republican and back taxes?
11 posted on
10/28/2005 3:29:53 PM PDT by
Dan from Michigan
("My Gov'nor don't got the answer")
To: Crackingham
I'm going to help my grandmother pay her gas bill this winter.
Why does she need Judd Gregg to do it for her?
12 posted on
10/28/2005 3:30:43 PM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(What, me worry?)
To: Crackingham
Well just where does the good Senator think the oil companies will get the money to pay his tax?
The whole damn Washington, DC needs to be cleaned out and we need to start all over again. Go back to the original Constitution, trash all the crap that has been tacked on it since 1783 and start again, with some people with brains in their head running things.
13 posted on
10/28/2005 3:30:57 PM PDT by
Flint
To: Crackingham
How about letting them build refineries with the profits?
14 posted on
10/28/2005 3:31:05 PM PDT by
arjay
(May God give President Bush strength and comfort in this time of struggle!)
To: Crackingham
This is just grandstanding. Gregg knows very well that the House would never approve this, even if, by some chance, the Senate did.
16 posted on
10/28/2005 3:31:28 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(Trust, but vilify.)
To: Crackingham
19 posted on
10/28/2005 3:35:03 PM PDT by
Crawdad
(So the guy says to the doctor, "It hurts when I do this.")
To: Crackingham
Bill Frist said he would ask the top executives of major oil companies to testify on why oil prices are so high While you're at it, senator, hold some hearings on why the national debt is eight trillion dollars.
20 posted on
10/28/2005 3:36:14 PM PDT by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
To: Crackingham
This guy has a point. The oil companies don't know what to do with all those profits. They'd just use it the way they see fit - to make even more money. How obscene. The money would be far better in the government's hands. /sarcasm
Who elects these dingbats?
To: Crackingham
Easily the most hare-brained idea I've ever heard.
The "greedy" oil companies will just shrug their shoulders and pass the costs back onto consumers.
To: Crackingham
Higher-than-usual profits is what encourages investors to provide capital to expand the industry, creating greater supply and thus lowering prices. I wish people would stop trying to break the free market anytime they don't understand how it's working with a glance.
23 posted on
10/28/2005 3:39:28 PM PDT by
Sofa King
(MY rights are not subject to YOUR approval.)
To: Crackingham
I like this statement better:
I believe it is time to take a serious look at reinstituting an excess profit tax term limits on oil companies congressmen with the proceeds tax savings being put towards the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) and deficit reduction," Gregg said in a statement.
25 posted on
10/28/2005 3:44:15 PM PDT by
deaconjim
(Can I be on the Supreme Court too? Can I, can I? Pleeeeeeeeeeeeze?)
To: Crackingham
"I believe it is time to take a serious look at reinstituting an excess profit tax on oil companies with the proceeds being put towards the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) and deficit reduction," Gregg said in a statement. It's time for Judd Gregg to be ridden out on a rail.
Just what in the h*ll is an "excess profit"? Does the government now decide how much profit my company is allowed to make?
26 posted on
10/28/2005 3:49:05 PM PDT by
jess35
To: Crackingham
How about taxing athletes who make multi-multi-millions for throwing a ball in a hoop! Isn't their salary a bit excessive for what they do? Let's confiscate some of the NBA salaries to pay for the poor urban heating instead.
-PJ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson