Posted on 10/28/2005 2:30:39 PM PDT by marty60
That is interesting. Where can we check that info? Thanks.
You? Speechless? Say it ain't so.
but it does suck when the CIA is overrun with lefty Fairfax county apartchiks
Thanks Peach!
I just copied your entire post into a Word document.
I will try to put it to good use!
Way. Yowza. Great work, really great. Anyone interested can Google Clinton/deaths and see the 3 or 4 websites (and counting?)devoted to suspicious deaths of Clint Agonistees.
But the work you sited here is nothing less than stupendous in its breadth and assocated stench. Well done.
Not exactly, as it relates to the indictment.
"Scooter Libby is a smart guy and a smart lawyer. Everyone agrees on that."
If this is true, and I assume it is how on earth can we believe he talked to REPORTERS, who are known to be great enemies of the Bush Presidency, and discussed Classified Information? He would have to be a fool to do that. I don't think he's a fool, so what happened? I know, from personal experience, that the last person on earth I'd discuss classified information with would be enemies of my boss, it would be personal suicide for me even if I hated my boss. Yes, the outline of the case presented by the Prosecutor is entirely too simple, something is very wrong here.
> how the CIA can be used by liberals to undermine a president *we* elected.
Worse still: how it can be used as such, while making it a crime to expose their treachery.
Don't know. I'd like to know why Joe thought it prudent to change his story for the sake of the New York Times article.
On another subject, I'd like to know why no one could figure out Saddam was gaming the Oil for Food program, and bribing people and governments.
Follow the money.
Sounds like a plan. I don't care for the idea of U.S. foreign policy being geared to aid international corruption.
Wilson, his wife and their accomplices in the CIA are criminal conspirators. It's incumbent upon bloggers to bring them down as they did Dan Rather.
It has been in need of good cleaning for a few years - start with Val.
Maybe this is a useful technique for getting rid of incompetents, but mostly I have seen it used by backstabbers who are insecure because this is their only real job skill. Curiously these people are often female.
At one company where I worked their was a woman who had risen from a receptionist position to vice president using this technique. Scores of excellent employees lost their jobs because their competence was a threat to her. It eventually became obvious why most firings in the company came from her department and she was canned.
Clinton Ends His Presidency as He Began It
Christopher Ruddy
Friday, Jan. 19, 2001
Bill Clinton’s last full day of his presidency ended as he began his first full day, with a subversion of justice.
Today Bill Clinton cut a deal with independent counsel Robert Ray that lets him off the hook for criminal prosecution.
We should not forget that Bill Clinton’s first act as president was to fire all the U.S attorneys across the U.S. – an unprecedented act by an American president.
At the time, critics of the president linked the firing to an effort to stave off the prosecution of House Ways and Means Committee chairman Dan Rostenkowski.
But the real truth became clearer as the scandal known as Whitewater unfolded.
The real reason Clinton fired every U.S. attorney was to save himself, not Rostenkowski.
As we now know, the U.S. attorney in Little Rock was closing in on Clinton for Whitewater-related matters and his and Hillary’s involvement in the defrauding of the Small Business Administration.
Clinton’s replacement for U.S. attorney in Little Rock was Paula Casey, a former law school student of his. She did much to protect her patron.
Clinton carried much criminal baggage before he arrived at the White House, and his administration soon opened his luggage to create an administration in his image: the most corrupt in American history.
Clinton is no dummy; he knew the Justice Department would be his Achilles’ heel.
This is precisely why he sacked all the U.S. attorneys.
This is why he put his "best" friend, convicted felon Webster Hubbell, over at Justice as associate attorney general.
This is why his administration secretly sabotaged the nominations of Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood to make way for Janet Reno, the prosecutor from Miami Vice who had almost a perfect record of never prosecuting white-collar criminals or politicians.
This is why he fired FBI Director William Sessions in an unprecedented and sudden act the day before Vince Foster was found with a bullet hole in his head in Fort Marcy Park.
This is why he had Janet Reno hand-pick Robert Fiske as Whitewater special counsel – a man who as U.S. attorney in New York never found one politician who had committed a crime.
This is why he accepted Robert Fiske’s recommendation of Louis Freeh as the FBI director.
This is why he consented as Freeh quickly removed, retired or transferred out the entire executive committee of assistant FBI directors in a most effective coup d’etat that got no press ink.
No doubt Clinton knew that by controlling the Justice Department and the FBI, he and his administration would have a free hand.
His minions could blackmail U.S. congressmen, the IRS could engage in witch-hunt audits, his head of White House security could gain custody of 1,000 confidential FBI files of Republicans, his Pentagon appointees could illegally release the personnel files of Linda Tripp, and so on.
So powerful was Clinton’s control over the judicial and law enforcement apparatus of the country, the communist Chinese could illegally funnel more than $10 million to help his 1996 re-election campaign.
At the same time, the president could give away the most guarded secrets of our nation to China, an avowed enemy, including supercomputer technology to build nuclear weapons and ballistic missile technology – technology that now allows China’s missiles to hit our cities with pinpoint accuracy.
And all of this could be done in silence and with the complicity of the highest officials in the land.
It comes as no surprise that on Clinton’s last day in office he has again cut a "deal" that lets him off the hook.
"I tried to walk a fine line between acting lawfully and testifying falsely, but I now recognize that I did not fully accomplish that goal and that certain of my responses to questions about Ms. Lewinsky were false,'' the president said in a statement issued today.
Basically Clinton admits he committed perjury, got caught at it, but feels he’s been punished enough. He has decided his punishment, not an independent legal authority such as a jury or court.
Robert Ray, like his predecessor Starr, has taken the low road. Perhaps he believes it is in "the best interests of the country," a phrase often used by cowardly men.
I disagree strongly that Clinton should walk and that somehow this is in the interests of the country.
The country may well see the fruits of the Clinton corruption and acquiescence of people like Starr and Ray to Clinton’s corruption, as domestic problems and foreign crises emerge in the months and years ahead.
Absolutely.
Incredible. I noted the date of your work, also- why isn't more of this out in the press? You gave me- us- an awful lot of meat to chew, there- thank you so much. HAD to copy it. Will work on it, also.
Do you think that one of the reasons the pols are spending so very much on their campaigns is that- hold onto our tin foil hats- they are bribing the MSM? Don't the NYT and their ilk get audited? Do you think the NYT/LAT/WashP set one rate for Republicans and another for the Dems? At least it seems to me NYT, as a public corp, with shareholders- has to open its books; but then, their editors/writers could be taking moolah privately. Also AP?
Probably, now I think on it. Would explain a lot.
My governor, a Republican, TG, is trying to reform campaign finance, but so far no one has mentioned requiring the pols to show WHERE they spend, and how much. Think I'll mention it, publicly (he has a monthly radio call-in show).
Ditto. Kinda makes you grateful for John Bolton; let's hope he "stays the course" at the UN, and somehow affects a severe reduction in US $ to those creeps in the Oil For Food crimes- let's please not refer to that as a "scandal"! We might take a good look at those pols in Congress who opposed his nomination.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.