Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hodar; cripplecreek
AS I understand the story (and no surprise that the Wash Post does not give the whole story, at least in this excerpt), the gay man in question is living in an active "partnered" relationship. He loudly announced his status, that he has no intention of ever stopping his activities and that he does not consider them sinful. This is very different from someone admitting that he or she is a sinner, repents and wants to change. I'm sure if this fellow did that he would be welcomed with open arms.

I think this Methodist minister should be saluted, not fired.

In the Episcopal Church (which I recently washed my hands of) the situation was much the same. First gay lay members were welcomed, and once they were established and found to be "Holy", gay priests were next and now there is a gay bishop. And the official church teaching is now that gay sex, far from being a sin, is sacramental.

34 posted on 10/28/2005 3:02:03 PM PDT by Martin Tell (Red States [should act like they] Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Martin Tell
AS I understand the story (and no surprise that the Wash Post does not give the whole story, at least in this excerpt), the gay man in question is living in an active "partnered" relationship.

I know a couple of hetereosexual couples living together without benefit of matrimony who attend my Methodist church. Should they be expelled, too?

35 posted on 10/28/2005 3:04:27 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Martin Tell

So what you're saying is that the Rabbi who attended my church should have been expelled because he had no interest in conversion.


36 posted on 10/28/2005 3:04:37 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Martin Tell

If your understanding is correct; I am in full agreement with you. For the church to permit an openly Gay member; who intends to continue his 'lifestyle' is an affront to everything the church stands for.


41 posted on 10/28/2005 3:09:30 PM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Martin Tell

"He loudly announced his status, that he has no intention of ever stopping his activities and that he does not consider them sinful."

What about the millions of heterosexual couples who are cohabiting (not married)? Most, if not all, don't consider that behaviour to be sinful. Should they all be kicked out of the Church? The pews will be awfully empty!


137 posted on 10/29/2005 4:07:18 AM PDT by calreaganfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson