To call it "two wrongs" implies that both are of equal weight.
Clinton's crimes wer orders of magnitude more serious and devastating to our national security than what Libby did. Hell, if you don't want to have "two wrongs" make a right, how about if we just agree not to discuss Hillary's documented lies to the prosecutor investigating Travelgate?
So that makes us even.
That still leaves Clinton's conveyanvce to China of critical missile launching technology -- giving China (for the first time ever) the ability to launch long range nuclear missiles to US territory. Clinton's quid pro quo was all those Chinese campaign contributions.
And then there was the 4-day bombing of Baghdad -- without the approval of Congress and justified as a response to Saddam's WMD capabilities -- timed exactly to coincide with the House impeachment vote in the hope of delaying the proceeding until the next term when more Democrats would be seated.
There's more, as we all know, but you get the point, I hope.
So please don't suggest that Clinton's crimes are in any way comparable to the Libby indictment. The American people must never forget what Clinton did to our country.
Very well put! And I totally agree. What Clinton did was so much worse than Libby it trivializes it to comapre the two.