To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
You might be right, but we don't know either way right now. If he is guilty then this is appropriate. The point is, a high-profile prosecutor spent 24 months discovering that Libby couldn't get his stories straight about a non-crime.
Pathetic.
219 posted on
10/28/2005 10:11:42 AM PDT by
sinkspur
(Trust, but vilify.)
To: sinkspur
Libby has no right to lie to a grand jury just because he thinks the charges are lame. What's so hard about telling the truth?
236 posted on
10/28/2005 10:14:51 AM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people. Ps. 14:34)
To: sinkspur
The point is, a high-profile prosecutor spent 24 months discovering that Libby couldn't get his stories straight about a non-crime.That's it in a nutshell. All these *%#@ talking heads don't want to admit that this is what it boils down to. To them - it's all "bad news" for the WH
259 posted on
10/28/2005 10:19:12 AM PDT by
daybreakcoming
(May God bless those who enter the valley of the shadow of death so that we may see the light of day.)
To: sinkspur
The point is, a high-profile prosecutor spent 24 months discovering that Libby couldn't get his stories straight about a non-crime. What is even worse is that a SP spent more time and money on White Water and could not even get an Indictment of the Clintons.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson