To: West Coast Conservative
What we can conclude from this is that no one criminally leaked Plame's name.
17 posted on
10/28/2005 9:48:01 AM PDT by
Pete
To: Pete
You won't hear that on any news outlet except for Fox.
32 posted on
10/28/2005 9:49:54 AM PDT by
Feiny
(What Would Scooby Doo?)
To: Pete
What we can conclude from this is that no one criminally leaked Plame's name.That was just the democrats bait.
To: Pete
What we can conclude from this is that no one criminally leaked Plame's name. I'd say it's a Blue Fitzmas for the dems.
83 posted on
10/28/2005 9:54:18 AM PDT by
jellybean
(George Allen 2008)
To: Pete
"What we can conclude from this is that no one criminally leaked Plame's name."
I think you're right!
Someone kindly offered me the link for the indictment ... I scanned it and see this as a legal witch hunt with NO substance.
108 posted on
10/28/2005 9:57:08 AM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Pete
The assertion that "leaking" Plame's name was a crime was bogus all along. She wasn't a covert agent, and she would have to have been one for a crime to have been committed. Everyone knew that all along, including the reporters who dubbed this the "CIA leak case".
The CIA has certainly gone downhill. No wonder our intelligence operations are in such poor shape. Why are mediocrities, phonies, and tabloid types like Wilson and Plame even allowed near the CIA building?
152 posted on
10/28/2005 10:03:45 AM PDT by
puroresu
(Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson