Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libby indicted on obstruction of justice, false statement and perjury charge - RESIGNS
http://drudgereport.com/ ^ | October 28, 2005

Posted on 10/28/2005 9:45:41 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative

Libby indicted on obstruction of justice, false statment and perjury charge...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: beltwaywarzone; cialeak; fitz; fitzgerald; hero; indictment; judymiller; libby; liberalinquisition; liedtofbi; liedtograndjury; marthastewart2; martyr; mattcooper; obstruction; pardon; phishing; plame; politicalpersecution; timrussert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 741-751 next last
To: fooman
LOL!

You cannot lie in court. Period. I really do not see why that is such a difficult concept. There is no justice for anyone if you can lie just as long as the case turns out a certain way. Our legal oaths must mean something or we have no working judicial system at all (which may be true anyway, but still).

121 posted on 10/28/2005 9:58:58 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people. Ps. 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

right. but martha WAS told by the common broker that waksaw was selling. The public did not have this info....


122 posted on 10/28/2005 9:59:02 AM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

"I read somewhere that some of Libby's notes recovered by Fitz were on a hard drive that Libby thought he had wiped clean. That would be enough for an obstruction indictment."

Maybe an indictment, but that's a long way from a conviction. He would have to have corroborating evidence showing that Libby purposely deleted the files in order to conceal information from the prosecutor.


123 posted on 10/28/2005 9:59:13 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: conserv13

Or Libby has been "over-charged" in order to get him to plea to the lesser of the counts.


124 posted on 10/28/2005 9:59:15 AM PDT by Rokurota (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet
WAS VALRIE PLAME A "COVERT AGENT" AT THE TIME OF THE LEAK? Why can't anyone answer this? If not this was all a hubub about nothing and Libby fell into the trap. Does anyone have any docs confirming Plame was a "Covert Agent" at the time of the Leak?
125 posted on 10/28/2005 9:59:18 AM PDT by rip033 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Exactly. There was no crime regarding the leak. None was committed. Lying to a grand jury is serious but they'll probably arrange a plea bargain and get it down to a misdemeanor. As far as scandals go, it wasn't there and the libs are seriously depressed. Rove's still at large.

("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")

126 posted on 10/28/2005 10:00:14 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

what a bore. anyone can be charged with anything with no evidence. as i've said in previous posts, only Bill Clinton could not be even questioned when accused of rape. I would be arrested for rape if my wife or some girl simply accused (INDICTED) me of the crime. There would have to be no evidence for me to be charged. Simply, her word.


127 posted on 10/28/2005 10:00:16 AM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rip033

Nope, she wasn't. That's why Fitzy had to double check to make sure he was authorized to investigate other matters outside of that one.


128 posted on 10/28/2005 10:00:31 AM PDT by Rokurota (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: roylene
Who told Novack? Why was he not called to testify?

It's time for him to come forward and name names.

129 posted on 10/28/2005 10:00:36 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Uriah_lost
Lewis "Ham Sandwich" Libby

Bump.

130 posted on 10/28/2005 10:00:36 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

CNBC ran the trailer "Libby Lied"

What happened to "allegedly"? I guess that only applies to real criminals.

And indictment is NOT a conviction.


131 posted on 10/28/2005 10:00:37 AM PDT by FairOpinion (CA Props: Vote for Reform: YES on 73-78, NO on 79 & 80, NO on Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45
It's maddening ... what the Clinton's GOT AWAY WITH!

It still PISSES ME OFF!

BOTH should be in prison.

Instead they couldn't act more self righteous.

Sickening.
132 posted on 10/28/2005 10:00:40 AM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

I love the Smell of a Pardon in the Morning!


133 posted on 10/28/2005 10:00:43 AM PDT by H. Paul Pressler IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rip033

Listening to CNN- Tim Russert is mentioned heavily in the indictment.


So his reporting hasn't exactly been unbiased.


134 posted on 10/28/2005 10:01:06 AM PDT by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Rokurota
Or Libby has been "over-charged" in order to get him to plea to the lesser of the counts.

That could be. That kind of thing happens all the time.

135 posted on 10/28/2005 10:01:29 AM PDT by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity
"Close the borders and then I would agree with you...time to get concerned not about politics, but the union.."

Completely agree.

136 posted on 10/28/2005 10:01:38 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: vanbc


Previous behaviour of special prosecutors versus today`s Fitzgerald who in desperation is trying to salvage his reputation on a junk indictment.Total contradiction to crimes that were left unindicted by previous SP`s who investigated the Clintons.

Libby`s lawyers will probably call Wilson and Plame to the witness stand.


137 posted on 10/28/2005 10:01:57 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

"I have repeatedly said that Bush's biggest failure has been his refusal to broom the clintonoids out of his administration. "

Yep.

Remember that one of Clinton's first tasks was to get rid of all the Federal prosecutors and replace them with his own people?


138 posted on 10/28/2005 10:01:58 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
LOL. I'm pretty amazed that a lawyer as skilled as Libby would do something so dumb. It really doesn't make sense. Libby was a white-collar defense lawyer, he knows all about prosecutors' tactics and what a good prosecutor can find and force out of you. I'm quite disappointed that Libby gave Fitz anything to indict him on.

We made a lot of hay out of Bill Clinton lying to a grand jury and Hillary making false statements in the Travelgate investigation. We can't be here defending Scooter Libby for doing the same thing.

139 posted on 10/28/2005 10:02:06 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (2,4,6,8 - a burka makes me look overweight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Perhaps now the Bush White House will understand it is most stupid to be chatting with the left-wing media.
140 posted on 10/28/2005 10:02:07 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 741-751 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson