Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Critics say energy conservation campaign is useless, bound to fail
The Chicago Tribune ^ | October 28, 2005 | WILLIAM NEIKIRK

Posted on 10/28/2005 6:43:53 AM PDT by GreenFreeper

WASHINGTON — As the central character in President Bush's new energy conservation program, the Energy Hog is no gentle, sweet little Smokey Bear. This villainous cartoon pig consumes energy like candy and evokes little sympathy. Yet he is the chief symbol of America's notorious fuel-wasting habits in the Bush administration's multimedia campaign to exhort people to use less energy in all walks of life. To the Energy Department and energy-efficiency experts who support the new conservation program, this campaign, introduced in the wake of higher oil prices, is badly needed to persuade Americans to take sensible steps to save energy. It is especially targeted at children ages 8 to 13 who can play an Internet game to try to stop the Energy Hog's nefarious energy-wasting antics. At energyhog.com, where the game is available, a player, whether young or old, has to work fast to electronically caulk a window to keep the Energy Hog out. "He's the Smokey the Bear of the 21st century," said Kateri Callahan, president of the Alliance to Save Energy, a partner in the government's conservation effort. "People may be motivated to save energy, but they may not know how." To its critics, it is yet another voluntary government plan that is bound to fail, such as former President Jimmy Carter's wearing of a sweater in the White House to try to induce people to turn down their thermostats. Conservatives lambasted Carter for using symbolism to deal with energy problems, and the program was a political bust.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; conservation; ecology; ecoping; energy; environment
This was posted on a FR banned site today but was originally printed in the Tribune.

At energyhog.com, where the game is available, a player, whether young or old, has to work fast to electronically caulk a window to keep the Energy Hog out."If they want a poster boy for the Energy Hog, they can put President Bush's mug up there for jetting around the country for useless photo ops to try to bring his poll numbers back up," Taylor said.

This ought to be good!

1 posted on 10/28/2005 6:43:55 AM PDT by GreenFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam; Carry_Okie; Chanticleer; ClearCase_guy; cogitator; CollegeRepublican; ...
ECO-PING

FReepmail me to be added or removed to the ECO-PING list!

2 posted on 10/28/2005 6:44:54 AM PDT by GreenFreeper (Not blind opposition to progress, but opposition to blind progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper

Energy campaign runs out of steam?.............


3 posted on 10/28/2005 6:47:11 AM PDT by Red Badger (I've eaten so much crow in my life that I'm immune to bird flu.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper
The site is actually energyhog.org.


4 posted on 10/28/2005 6:48:21 AM PDT by GreenFreeper (Not blind opposition to progress, but opposition to blind progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper

I'm turning down the heat because it costs 450.00 per oil delivery.


5 posted on 10/28/2005 6:50:24 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper

Price rationing works.


6 posted on 10/28/2005 6:50:49 AM PDT by SevenDaysInMay (Dallas radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper

What a waste of money. Do people really need the government to tell them how to save energy? I mean, it's right there at their energy provider's website and at least SCEG sends out mailers in my power bill every so often listing ways to save. Not to mention being able to do an internet search on 'energy conservation' and getting tons of hits. If people are interested in and/or care about saving energy they can and will easily find the information they need, if they aren't, they won't. I don't see how much difference this program is really going to make.


7 posted on 10/28/2005 6:54:10 AM PDT by Gardener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper

A widespread campaign to conserve energy might temporarily reduce costs but we need a sound energy policy.


8 posted on 10/28/2005 6:55:42 AM PDT by msjhall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper
GW Bush prefers market based solutions to energy conservation,
That is why, instead of developing domestic supplies, he has promoted offshore industrial development that increases global demand and boosts the price of oil. When we feel enough pain at the pump, we'll start buying Chicom mopeds.
9 posted on 10/28/2005 6:56:48 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper

Just what, pray tell, is a FR banned site?


10 posted on 10/28/2005 6:57:02 AM PDT by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gardener
What a waste of money. Do people really need the government to tell them how to save energy?

Well I suppose there is something to be said about the site being aimed at kids. Not exactly a good use of tax payer money but I doubt many kids would log onto a local energy provider to find out info on conservation.

11 posted on 10/28/2005 6:58:19 AM PDT by GreenFreeper (Not blind opposition to progress, but opposition to blind progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wita
Just what, pray tell, is a FR banned site?

No, the article was posted on the Journal News and we aren't allowed to post from that site. I just happened to find the same article printed in the Tribune a while back.

12 posted on 10/28/2005 6:59:42 AM PDT by GreenFreeper (Not blind opposition to progress, but opposition to blind progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper

I'm with WITA. What do you mean, "not allowed" - by whom?


13 posted on 10/28/2005 9:25:45 AM PDT by BuglerTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BuglerTex

When I tried to link to the Journal News I got a message (from FR) that they do not allow excerpted articles from their site.


14 posted on 10/28/2005 10:15:13 AM PDT by GreenFreeper (Not blind opposition to progress, but opposition to blind progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper

A few months ago, I scoped a nametag on a fellow at the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center in Austin: "Gifford Pinchot". Turns out he really is the descendant of a man I consider to be the father of right thinking conservation and resource management. He is the founder of the Bainbridge Graduate Center, which I believe is bringing applied sustainable industry practices to the business and professional communities.

http://www.bgiedu.org/


15 posted on 10/28/2005 11:21:26 AM PDT by BuglerTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BuglerTex
Neat Site!

"The outgrowth of conservation, the inevitable result, is national efficiency." -Pinchot

That pretty much sums up his land ethic.

16 posted on 10/28/2005 11:36:18 AM PDT by GreenFreeper (Not blind opposition to progress, but opposition to blind progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper

Pinchot and Muir did not meet at the Olympia Hotel and split over conservation versus aesthetic preservation at that supposed encounter, as so many "environmentalists" contend, as Rachael Carson reported, erroneously. They did split, but over another issue, and the camps divided. This is from my son's history Prof.


17 posted on 10/28/2005 12:00:58 PM PDT by BuglerTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper

How much energy would be saved by shutting down the Department of Energy?


18 posted on 10/28/2005 12:02:56 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper

I thought the high energy prices would engender conservation all by themselves. Obviously we're all too dumb to get a clue when prices soar.


19 posted on 10/28/2005 6:53:34 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! --kellynla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
"GW Bush prefers market based solutions to energy conservation, That is why, instead of developing domestic supplies, he has promoted offshore industrial development that increases global demand and boosts the price of oil. When we feel enough pain at the pump, we'll start buying Chicom mopeds."

Free trade does promote higher oil consumption. Figure you have a shipload of iron ore sent from Australia to South Korea. There it is turned into cars and the cars are sent to America. Far less oil would be used if the iron ore was sent straight to America and turned into cars.

We also spend a fortune to dredge deeper harbors and shipping channels to accommodate ever larger ships to funnel more imports into America. Kind of like a heroin addict getting a catheter tube.
20 posted on 10/29/2005 10:45:49 AM PDT by fallujah-nuker (Open Borders: The RINOcracy waging class warfare against America wage earners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson