Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Wilson-Plame-Novak-Rove Blame Game (Annenberg Fact Check)
FacCheck.org ^ | July 22 05

Posted on 10/27/2005 11:58:45 PM PDT by victim soul

The Wilson-Plame-Novak-Rove Blame Game Both sides twist and hype the case of a CIA agent’s leaked identity. We document what’s known so far.

July 22, 2005 Modified:July 22, 2005 Summary

Copyright 2005 Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania

Judgments expressed are those of FactCheck.org’s staff, not the Annenberg Center

The disclosure of CIA agent Valerie Wilson’s identity has triggered a partisan blame game complete with distortions and misstatements by both sides. Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman said the agent’s husband Joe Wilson falsely claimed Vice President Cheney authorized his trip to Africa – a claim Wilson never actually made. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid said on the floor of the Senate that the leak “put this agent’s life in jeopardy,” a claim for which no evidence has surfaced.

Here we won’t attempt to debunk every false or misleading claim. We thought our readers would be better served by a timeline documenting what is publicly known so far, with citations for each fact and links to original source whenever possible.

We have no idea whether Karl Rove or anybody else has broken the law, something that can only be decided by a judge and jury should any charges ever be brought. Some information remains classified, and we can't know what facts the special prosecutor may have turned up, as they are protected by grand-jury secrecy. New bits and pieces seem to surface almost daily.

Here is what we know so far:

Analysis

1988-1991 – Joseph Wilson serves as Deputy Chief of Mission in Baghdad , Iraq. In July 1990, he takes over as acting ambassador to Iraq . (Joseph Wilson, The Politics of Truth 451, 2004).

1992-1995 – Nominated by President George H.W. Bush, Wilson serves as Ambassador to the African nations of Gabon , as well as the smaller island country of the Democratic Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe. (Wilson, Politics 451).

1995-1997 – Joseph Wilson serves as political adviser to the Commander in Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces in Europe, stationed in Germany . On a trip to Washington DC, Wilson meets Valerie Plame who at the time says she is an “energy executive living in Brussels. ” (Wilson, Politics 239-242).

June 1997 – Joseph Wilson returns to Washington DC as Senior Director for African Affairs at the National Security Council. At about the same time, Plame also moves back to the United States (Wilson, Politics 240), in part because the CIA suspects her name was leaked to the Russians in 1994. ( Vanity Fair, Jan. ‘04) .

April 3, 1998 – Wilson and Plame marry. (Wilson, Politics 276).

July 1998 – Joseph Wilson leaves government service to open a consulting firm specializing in assisting international investment in Africa. (Wilson, Politics 275).

1999 – Joseph Wilson takes a trip to Niger at the behest of the CIA to investigate “uranium-related matters” separate from Iraq . (Wilson, Politics lv-lvi). According to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report on pre-war intelligence, Wilson “was selected for the 1999 trip after his wife mentioned to her supervisors that her husband was planning a business trip to Niger in the near future and might be willing to use his contacts in the region.” (Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Report on Prewar Assessment of Iraq Intelligence, 39, July 2004).

April 22, 1999 – Valerie Wilson lists “Brewster-Jennings & Assoc.”—later revealed to be a CIA front company—as her employer when making a donation to the Gore campaign. ( Gore FEC filing).

June 1999 – Niger ’s former prime minister Ibrahim Mayaki meets with an Iraqi delegation wanting to discuss “expanding commercial relations.” Mayaki interprets this as an interest in uranium, Niger ’s main export, and later tells Wilson that he did not discuss it because Iraq remained under UN trade sanctions. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 43-44, July 2004).

October 15, 2001 – US intelligence agencies become aware of reports from the Italian intelligence service of a supposed agreement between Iraq and Niger for the sale of uranium yellowcake. The State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research considers the report “highly suspect” because the French control Niger ’s uranium industry. The CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the Department of Energy consider a uranium deal “possible.” (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 36, July 2004).

October 18, 2001 – The CIA writes a report titled, Iraq: Nuclear-Related Procurement Efforts. It quotes many of the Italian report’s claims, but adds that the report of a completed deal is not corroborated by any other sources. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 36-37, July 2004).

February 5, 2002 – The CIA’s Directorate of Operations – the clandestine branch that employed Valerie Wilson – issues a second report including “verbatim text” of an agreement, supposedly signed July 5-6, 2000 for the sale of 500 tons of uranium yellowcake per year. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 37, July 2004).

February 12, 2002 – The Defense Intelligence Agency writes a report concluding “Iraq is probably searching abroad for natural uranium to assist in its nuclear weapons program.” Vice President Cheney reads this report and asks for the CIA’s analysis. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 38-39, July 2004).

Responding to inquiries from Cheney’s office, the State Department, and the Defense Department, the CIA’s Directorate of Operations’ Counterproliferation Division (CPD) look for more information. They consider having Wilson return to Niger to investigate. In the process, Valerie Wilson writes a memo to a superior saying, “My husband has good relations with both the PM [prime minister] and the former Minister of Mines (not to mention lots of French contacts), both of whom could possibly shed light on this sort of activity.” One of Valerie Wilson’s colleagues later tells Senate investigators she “offered up his name” for the trip. Wilson says that her agency made the decision and she only later approached her husband on the CIA’s behalf. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 39, July 2004).

February 19, 2002 – Joseph Wilson meets with officials from CIA and the State Department. According to a State Department intelligence analyst’s notes, the meeting was convened by Valerie Wilson. She later testifies that she left the meeting after introducing her husband. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 40, July 2004).

February 26, 2002 – Wilson arrives in Niger . He concludes, after a few days of interviews, that “it was highly unlikely that anything was going on.” (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 42, July 2004).

March 5, 2002 –Wilson reports back to two CIA officers at his home. Valerie Wilson is present but does not participate. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 43, July 2004).

March 8-9, 2002 – An intelligence report of Wilson ’s trip is sent through routine channels, identifying Wilson only as “a contact with excellent access who does not have an established reporting record.” (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 43-44, July 2004). The CIA grades Wilson ’s information as “good,” the middle of five possible grades. Cheney is not directly briefed about the report. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 46, July 2004).

September 24, 2002 – The British government issues a public dossier saying, “[T]here is intelligence that Iraq has sought the supply of significant quantities of uranium from Africa .” ( British Govt. Report 25, Sept. 2002). The Washington Post reports later that the CIA tried unsuccessfully to get the British to omit these claims. (" Bush, Rice blame CIA ,” July 2003).

October 1, 2002 – The National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) – a summary of intelligence assessments for policymakers – says “a foreign government service” reported that Niger planned to send several tons of "pure uranium" to Iraq , possibly up to 500 tons a year. “We do not know the status of this arrangement,” the NIE says, according to a later declassified version released by the White House. In the NIE, State Department intelligence officials caution that African uranium claims are “highly dubious.” ( Background WMD Briefing by Senior Administration Official ).

January 28, 2003 – Bush’s State of the Union Address includes this 16-word sentence: “The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. ” (Transcript of “ State of the Union" ).

March 7, 2003 – The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) – the international body that monitors nuclear proliferation – tells the UN Security Council that, after a “thorough analysis” with “concurrence of outside experts,” that the Italian documents— “which formed the basis for the reports of recent uranium transactions between Iraq and Niger—are in fact not authentic.” ( Status of Nuclear Inspections in Iraq... , March 2003).

March 19, 2003 – President Bush announces the start of the Iraq war in a televised address, saying it is “to disarm Iraq , to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger.” (Bush, “ Addresses the Nation" ).

Spring 2003 –Valerie Wilson is in the process of moving from non-official to official, State Department cover, according to a later Vanity Fair article based on interviews with the Wilsons . ( Vanity Fair , January 2004).

May 2003 – Joseph Wilson begins advising the Kerry campaign on foreign policy issues. ( White House expects calls… ,” USA Today, October 2003).

May 6, 2003 – A New York Times columnist writes the first account of Wilson' s trip, but not naming him: “I'm told by a person involved in the Niger caper that more than a year ago the vice president's office asked for an investigation of the uranium deal, so a former U.S. ambassador to Africa was dispatched to Niger . In February 2002, according to someone present at the meetings, that envoy reported to the C.I.A. and State Department that the information was unequivocally wrong.” (" Missing In Action: Truth, ” New York Times, Op-ed, May 2003).

June 2003 – State Department intelligence officials reportedly prepare a memo on the Niger affair mentioning Wilson ’s trip to Niger and Valerie Wilson’s role in selecting her husband for the mission. The exact date is uncertain. The memo identifies Valerie Wilson but not her status as a covert agent, and it does not use her maiden name Valerie Plame. According to one account, the memo was classified and the paragraph containing information about Valerie Wilson was marked with “(S)” to indicate that the information was classified at the “secret” level. The CIA applies this level of classification to the identities of covert officers, according to the Washington Post. (“ State Dept. memo gets scrutiny… ,” New York Times, July 16, 2005; “ Probe Centers on Rove, Memo, Phone Calls, ” Bloomberg.com, July 18, 2005; “ Plame’s Identity Marked as Secret, ” Washington Post, July 21, 2005).

Analysis

June 12, 2003 – A Washington Post article quotes an “envoy” (Wilson ) as saying that the “dates were wrong and the names were wrong” on the Italian document determined to be forged by the IAEA. (" CIA Did Not Share Doubt…, ” Washington Post, June 2003). Wilson later tells the Senate Intelligence Committee that he may have “misspoken” to reporters, thinking he had seen the documents himself, rather than reading about them secondhand. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 44).

July 6, 2003 – Wilson publishes " What I didn’t find in Africa" in The New York Times, identifying himself for the first time as the unnamed “envoy.” He writes, “I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq 's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat.” Wilson does not mention that he learned there was a possibility Iraq had sought uranium during a 1999 trade meeting with Niger ’s former Prime Minister.

Contrary to later statements by White House officials, Wilson does not claim that Cheney sent him on the Niger trip, only that he was sent to answer questions from Cheney’s “office.” He also doesn’t claim that Cheney was told of his findings, only that it would be “standard operating procedure” for the CIA to brief Cheney’s office on the results of his mission. (Wilson, " What I didn’t find, New York Times July 6, 2003).

July 7, 2003 –Secretary of State Colin Powell, aboard Air Force One, reportedly receives a copy of the State Department memo prepared in June about the purported Niger-Iraq uranium deal, which mentions Valerie Wilson’s role in her husband’s trip, according to later media reports. (" State Dept. memo gets scrutiny…" New York Times , July 2005; " Memo Underscored … Shielding Plame’s Identity ,” Wall Street Journal , July 2005; " Memo Eyed in CIA Leak Probe, ” AP, July 2005).

July 7, 2003 – White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer retracts the 16-word yellowcake claim from the State of the Union address, calling the President's statement “incorrect.” ( White House Press Gaggle, July 7 2003) .

July 8, 2003 – Columnist Robert Novak calls senior White House adviser Karl Rove, according to subsequent media accounts. Novak tells Rove he had heard that Joseph Wilson’s wife, who worked for the CIA, played a role in Joseph Wilson’s trip to Niger. Rove confirms the story to Novak without mentioning Valerie Wilson’s name or covert status, saying “I heard that, too.” ( Rove ... Talk on C.I.A. Officer, NY Times, July 2003). Novak will later write that he originally acquired the information from an official who is “no partisan gunslinger.” Novak says, “When I called another official for confirmation, he said: ‘Oh, you know about it.’” (Novak, " CIA Leak" Chicago Sun-Times, Oct 2003).

July 11, 2003 –Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper calls Rove, who cautions him to be careful of Wilson ’s story, “‘Don't get too far out on Wilson ,’ he told me,” Cooper later writes. Rove tells Cooper that Wilson ’s wife works for the CIA on “WMD” (Weapons of Mass Destruction) and that it was she, not Cheney or the CIA’s director, who was “responsible” for sending Wilson to Africa. “Rove never used her name...indeed, I did not learn her name until the following week,” Cooper later recalls adding, “Rove never once indicated to me that she had any kind of covert status." Cooper says Rove ends the call saying “I've already said too much.”

Cooper also says he earlier had talked to Cheney’s Chief of Staff, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, about the story. “I asked Libby if he had heard anything about Wilson 's wife sending her husband to Niger. Libby replied, ‘Yeah, I've heard that too,’ or words to that effect. Like Rove, Libby never used Valerie Plame's name or indicated that her status was covert.” (Matthew Cooper, " What I told the Grand Jury, ” Time, July 2005).

July 11, 2003 – Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet concedes in a statement that the State of the Union claims about Iraqi attempts to buy uranium from Africa were a mistake and that the “16 words should never have been included in the text written for the President.” ( Tenet Statement, July 2003).

July 12, 2003 – Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus is told by an administration official that that White House had ignored Joseph Wilson’s 2002 trip to Niger because it was a “boondoggle” set up by his wife. (" Anonymous Sources, ” Nieman Reports 27, Summer 2005). Pincus did not report his conversation because, as he would later describe, “Plame's name was never mentioned and the purpose of the disclosure did not appear to be to generate an article, but rather to undermine Wilson 's report.” (" Probe Focuses on Month Before Leak, ” Washington Post, October 2003).

July 14, 2003 – Robert Novak’s " Mission to Niger" column is published. This is the first published mention of Joseph Wilson’s wife’s name, her employment at the CIA, and her role in his trip to Niger. In the sixth of ten paragraphs, Novak writes, “Wilson never worked for the CIA, but his wife, Valerie Plame, is an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction. Two senior administration officials told me Wilson 's wife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate the Italian report. The CIA says its counter-proliferation officials selected Wilson and asked his wife to contact him.” The column does not describe her as a covert agent, then, but it does name her as “Valerie Plame” – her maiden and cover name. Novak gives conflicting accounts of whether Mrs. Wilson instigated her husband’s trip or was asked by others to do so. (Novak, " The Mission to Niger, ” Chicago Sun-Times, July 2003).

July 14-17, 2003 – Newsday’s Washington bureau chief, Timothy Phelps, tells Joseph Wilson “that he had heard from the CIA that what Novak reported vis-à-vis Valerie’s employment was not incorrect,” according to Wilson’s memoir. “I declined to be drawn into a confirmation even then,” Wilson would later recall. ( Wilson, Politics 348) .

July 16, 2003 – Wilson speaks about his conversation about Novak’s column with David Corn, Washington bureau chief for the liberal magazine The Nation. According to what Corn writes on his blog at thenation.com, Wilson says, “Naming her this way would have compromised every operation, every relationship, every network with which she had been associated in her entire career.” Corn says Wilson is still “known to friends as an energy analyst for a private firm.” (" A White House Smear ,” The Nation, July 2003; Wilson, Politics, 349 ). Corn's entry is the first instance where someone alleges publicly that the release of Valerie Plame’s name disclosed the identity of a covert agent.

July 17, 2003 – Time publishes online “ A War on Wilson? ” by Cooper and others, the first time Time names Mrs. Wilson. Cooper quotes, “government officials” as saying “that Wilson 's wife, Valerie Plame, is a CIA official who monitors the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. These officials have suggested that she was involved in her husband's being dispatched Niger [sic] to investigate reports that Saddam Hussein's government had sought to purchase large quantities of uranium ore.” (Matt Cooper, " A War on Wilson? ,” Time, July 2003).

July 22, 2003 – In an article headlined “Columnist Blows CIA Agent's Cover,” Newsday publishes a story as saying, based in part on Wilson ’s assertions, that senior administration officials “violated the law and may have endangered her (Mrs. Wilson’s) career and possibly the lives of her contacts in foreign countries.” The newspaper says Wilson wouldn’t confirm that his wife was a covert agent. (“Columnist Blows CIA Agent's Cover, ” Newsday, July 2003).

July 30, 2003 – The CIA sends a letter to the Criminal Division of the Justice Department noting “a possible violation of criminal law concerning the unauthorized disclosure of classified information,” according to a letter from the CIA’s Director of Congressional Affairs. (CIA, Letter to John Conyers ).

August 21, 2003 – Wilson, speaking at a public panel discussion, said he was interested in seeing Karl Rove “frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs” after hearing from reporters that Rove had called his wife “fair game.” (Wilson, Politics 372-4; 351).

September 16, 2003 – The CIA sends another letter to Justice requesting that the FBI undertake a criminal investigation. (Wilson, Politics 359).

September 16, 2003 – White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan dismisses the idea that Karl Rove was Novak’s anonymous source as “totally ridiculous." ( White House Press Briefing, Sept. 16, 2003 ).

September 29, 2003 – McClellan says he has spoken to Rove, denies that Rove was involved in the leak, and says, “If anyone in this administration was involved in it [the leak], they would no longer be in this administration.” ( White House Press Briefing, Sept. 29, 2003) . In a letter sent to Representative John Conyers on January 30, 2004 , the CIA will confirm that its Counterespionage Section has asked the FBI to initiate an investigation. ( Letter to Rep. John Conyers from the CIA) .

September 30, 2003 – The Justice department publicly announces an official criminal investigation. Commenting, Bush says, “And if there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is. And if the person has violated law, the person will be taken care of.” (" President discusses job creation, ” U. of Chicago , Sept. 30, 2003 ).

September 30, 2003 – Wilson endorses Senator John Kerry for president. (“ Man … With an Independent Streak, ” Washington Post, October 1, 2003 ).

December 30, 2003 – Facing allegations of bias, Attorney General Ashcroft recuses himself from the investigation and U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald takes over the investigation as a special prosecutor. (" Ashcroft Recuses Self … ” Washington Post, 31 December 2003 ).

May 21, 2004 – Time's Cooper is subpoenaed for the grand jury investigation. Time says it will fight the subpoenas. (" Reporters Subpoenaed … " Wash. Post, May 2004).

June 10, 2004 – Bush is asked by a reporter, “[D]o you stand by your pledge to fire anyone found to have [who leaked the agent's name]?” Bush replies, “Yes. And that's up to the U.S. Attorney to find the facts.” ( President Bush Press Conference Following G-8 Summit, Savannah, GA, June 10, 2004).

June 24, 2004 – Prosecutors question President Bush, who is not under oath, in the Oval Office for over an hour. (" Bush Interviewed… ” Washington Post, June 25, 2004) .

August 12, 2004 – New York Times reporter Judith Miller, who did not write a story identifying Valerie Wilson, is subpoenaed by the grand jury. (" NY Times reporter subpoenaed… ” AP, Aug. 2004).

October 15, 2004 – Rove testifies before a federal grand jury for two hours. Fitzgerald assures Rove that he is not a target of the probe. (" Rove Testifies … ” Washington Post, Oct. 2004).

November 2, 2004 – Bush wins re-election.

June 27, 2005 – The Supreme Court declines to hear the appeal of Judith Miller of The New York Times and Cooper of Time, leaving standing a lower court’s ruling that they must testify to a federal grand jury. (" Reporters Lose … ” Washington Post, June 28, 2005 ).

July 1, 2005 – Over Cooper’s objections, Time Inc. turns over subpoenaed material. Time managing editor Norm Pearlstine tells CNN that journalists “regularly point a finger at people who think they're above the law,” and “I'm not comfortable being one of them myself.” (" Time Magazine ... ” CNN.com, June 30, 2005 ).

July 6, 2005 – Miller, still refusing to testify before the grand jury, is jailed for contempt of court. (" ’Time’ Reporter to Testify … ” USAToday.com, July 6, 2005 ).Cooper says he receives last-minute permission from his confidential source, Karl Rove, to testify. (Matthew Cooper, " What I told the Grand Jury, ” Time, July 2005).

July 18, 2005 – Bush – easing off his earlier statement to fire anyone who leaked – says “if someone committed a crime, they will no longer work in my administration.” ( Bush Press Conference with Prime Minister of India, July 18, 2005) . His press secretary Scott McClellan declines to say whether a firing would be triggered by an indictment or would require a conviction. ( White House Press Briefing, July 18, 2005 ).

--by Kevin Collins with Jordan Grossman, Jennifer L. Ernst, Matthew Barge, and Brooks Jackson

Sources

Bush, George W. “ President Bush Addresses the Nation ,” White House, Washington. 19 March 2003 .

Bush, George W. “ President Bush Holds Press Conference Following the G8 Summit ,” International Media Center , Savannah , Ga. 10 June 2004 .

Bush, George W. “ President Delivers State of the Union .” U.S. Capitol. 28 January 2003 .

Bush, George W. “President Discusses Job Creation With Business Leaders,”University of Chicago , Chicago , Illinois . 30 September 2003 .

Cooper, Matthew. “What I Told the Grand Jury.” Time25 July 2005 : 38.

Cooper, Matthew et al. “A War on Wilson?” Time.com17 July 2003 .

Corn, David. “A White House Smear.” TheNation.com.16 July 2003 .

Eggen, Dan and Allen, Mike. “ Ashcroft Recuses Self From Leak Case; U.S. Attorney To Oversee Probe .” Washington Post 31 December 2003 : A1.

ElBaradei, Mohamed. “ The Status of Nuclear Inspections in Iraq: An Update ,” Statement to the United Nations Security Council by International Atomic Energy Agency Director General, 7 March 2003 .

Fleischer, Ari. “Press Gaggle by Ari Fleischer.” The White House.7 July 2003 .

Great Britain . Assessment of the British Government. Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction. London : HMSO, 24 September 2002 .

Gore 2000, Inc. “ Report of Receipts and Disbursements by an Authorized Committee of a Candidate for the Office of President or Vice-President .” Federal Elections Commission. 15 July 1999 .

Johnson, Peter and Memmott, Mark. “ 'Time' reporter to testify; 'N.Y. Times' reporter jailed .” USAToday.com. 6 July 2005 .

Johnston, David and Richard W. Stevenson. “ Rove Reportedly Held Phone Talk on C.I.A. Officer .” New York Times 15 July 2003 : A1.

Keen, Judy and Toni Locy. “ White House expects calls for records .” USA Today. 2 October 2003 : 6A.

Kristof, Nicholas. “ Missing In Action: Truth .” Editorial. New York Times 6 May 2003 : A31.

Kurtz, Howard. " CIA Agent Valerie Plame Goes Undercover In Vanity Fair ." Washington Post 3 December 2004 : C1.

Leiby, Richard. " Man Behind the Furor; Wilson: Envoy With an Independent Streak ." Washington Post 1 October 2003 : A1.

Leiby, Richard and Walter Pincus. “ Ex-Envoy: Nuclear Report Ignored .” Washington Post 6 July 2003 : A13

Leonnig, Carol D. “ Reporters Lose Appeal, Face Jail Time; Supreme Court Refuses to Review Contempt Charge in Probe of Leak About CIA Agent .” Washington Post 28 June 2005 : A7.

McClellan, Scott. “Press Briefing by Scott McClellan.” The White House,16 September 2003 .

McClellan, Scott. “Press Briefing by Scott McClellan.” The White House,29 September 2003 .

"NY Times reporter subpoenaed in probe of CIA leak." Associated Press14 August 2004 .

Novak, Robert. “Columnist Wasn’t Pawn for Leak.” Editorial.Chicago Sun-Times 1 October 2003 : 49.

Novak, Robert. “The Mission to Niger.” Editorial.Chicago Sun-Times, 14 July 2003 : 31.

Phelps, Timothy M. and Knut Royce. “ Columnist Blows CIA Agent's Cover .” Newsday (New York ). 22 July 2003 : A04

Pincus, Walter. “Anonymous Sources: Their use in a time of prosecutorial interest.” Nieman Reports Summer 2005: 27-29.

Pincus, Walter. “ CIA Did Not Share Doubt on Iraq Data .” Washington Post. 12 June 2003 : A1.

Pincus, Walter and Allen, Mike. “Probe Focuses on Month Before Leak to Reporters.”Washington Post. 12 October 2003 : A1.

Pincus, Walter, and Milbank, Dana. “ Bush, Rice blame CIA for Iraq error .” Washington Post 12 July 2003 : A1.

Pincus, Walter, and VandeHei, Jim. “ Plame’s Identity Marked as Secret .” Washington Post. 21 July 2005 : A1.

Schmidt, Susan. “ Reporters Subpoenaed in CIA Leak .” Washington Post 22 May 2004 : A11.

Schmidt, Susan. " Bush Interviewed About CIA Leak ; President Not Under Oath in Discussing Release of Covert Officer's Name." Washington Post 25 June 2004 : A2.

Schmidt, Susan. " Rove Testifies in Probe of Leak of CIA Worker's Name ." Washington Post 16 October 2004 : A2.

Schweid, Barry. “ State Dept. Memo Eyed in CIA Leak Probe .” Associated Press 19 July 2005 .

“Senior Administration Official Holds Background Briefing on Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq .” Released by the White House. 18 July 2005 .

“Special Prosecutor’s Probe Centers on Rove, Memo, Phone Calls.” Bloomberg.com18 July 2005 .

Squeo, Anne Marie and John D. McKinnon. “ Memo Underscored Issue of Shielding Plame’s Identity .” Wall Street Journal 19 July 2005 : A3.

Tenet, George. “ Statement by George J. Tenet, Director Of Central Intelligence .” Press Release. Central Intelligence Agency, Langley , Va. 11 July 2003 .

United States . Senate. Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI). Report On The U.S. Intelligence Community’s Prewar Assessments On Iraq. 108th Congress. Washington : GPO, 7 July 2004 .

Stevenson, Richard. “State Dept. memo gets scrutiny in leak inquiry on C.I.A. officer.” New York Times16 July 2005 : A1.

“Time magazine to hand over reporter's notes .” CNN.com 30 June 2005 .

Ward, Vicky. “Double Exposure.” Vanity Fair. January 2004: 74-81.

Wilson, Joseph. The Politics of Truth. New York : Carroll and Graf, 2004.

Wilson, Joseph. “What I didn’t find in Africa.” Editorial. New York Times.6 July 2003 : Sec. 4 p. 9.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: joewilson; niger; valeriaplame; viceprescheney; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
August 21, 2003 – Wilson, speaking at a public panel discussion, said he was interested in seeing Karl Rove “frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs” after hearing from reporters that Rove had called his wife “fair game.” (Wilson, Politics 372-4; 351).
1 posted on 10/27/2005 11:58:47 PM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: victim soul

Good reference material.

I readily admit that I can't keep much of this straight, but I believe this is the first time I've noticed that Wilson took a trip to Niger way back in 99.

Also, if he was Deputy Chief of Mission in Iraq from 88-91, he was Deputy to April Glaspie (sp?).

One more thing, if Plame was still employed by the CIA when questions were raised, officials there could have ordered her to take a Polygraph.


2 posted on 10/28/2005 12:24:02 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: victim soul
September 30, 2003 – The Justice department publicly announces an official criminal investigation. Commenting, Bush says, “And if there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is. And if the person has violated law, the person will be taken care of.”

July 18, 2005 – Bush – easing off his earlier statement to fire anyone who leaked – says “if someone committed a crime, they will no longer work in my administration.”

That is not "easing off his earlier statement", it is being completely consistent. Maybe they don't understand that the only time someone "committed a crime" is when they have "violated the law". Or maybe they think anyone who doesn't agree with leftist crackpot politics is committing a crime.
3 posted on 10/28/2005 12:38:16 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: victim soul
And then there's this...

May 2003 – Joseph Wilson begins advising the Kerry campaign on foreign policy issues. ( White House expects calls… ,” USA Today, October 2003).

May 6, 2003 – A New York Times columnist writes the first account of Wilson' s trip, but not naming him: “I'm told by a person involved in the Niger caper that more than a year ago the vice president's office asked for an investigation of the uranium deal, so a former U.S. ambassador to Africa was dispatched to Niger . In February 2002, according to someone present at the meetings, that envoy reported to the C.I.A. and State Department that the information was unequivocally wrong.” (" Missing In Action: Truth, ” New York Times, Op-ed, May 2003).

July 6, 2003 – Wilson publishes " What I didn’t find in Africa" in The New York Times, identifying himself for the first time as the unnamed “envoy.” He writes, “I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq 's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat.” Wilson does not mention that he learned there was a possibility Iraq had sought uranium during a 1999 trade meeting with Niger ’s former Prime Minister.


Mr. Kerry has some things for which he should answer IMO.
4 posted on 10/28/2005 12:46:38 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: victim soul
This lays out all of Wilson's lies, and to make their "both sides do it" platitude, they have to go here:

Contrary to later statements by White House officials, Wilson does not claim that Cheney sent him on the Niger trip, only that he was sent to answer questions from Cheney’s “office.” He also doesn’t claim that Cheney was told of his findings, only that it would be “standard operating procedure” for the CIA to brief Cheney’s office on the results of his mission. (Wilson, " What I didn’t find, New York Times July 6, 2003).
Cheney, Cheney's office... what's the difference?
The media all the time replaces "Bush administration" with "Bush", as if the president had a direct role in the issue at hand. The two are interchangeable.
 
5 posted on 10/28/2005 2:20:46 AM PDT by counterpunch (JRB in '05 = GOP in '06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: victim soul

I'd like to know who the hell Wilson was prior to being appointed to anything.


6 posted on 10/28/2005 2:47:50 AM PDT by Solamente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

Seems like I remember hearing all the time that Cheney sent Wilson to Niger.


7 posted on 10/28/2005 2:48:07 AM PDT by patj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: victim soul

Interesting that they rely on Wilson's book for so many "facts". Hardly an unbiased source since little of it is reliable.


So did Plame really tell the CIA that Joe was going to Africa (and maybe Niger) anyway on his own business and could do this while her was there?? This trip was hapopeneing anyway? Was that her original justification for matching him to the task??

If so that would suggest this was a full bore effort to sucker the gov. into giving Joe credibility on the topic. and probably free air tickets, etc at taxpayer expense. What business was Joe actually conducting on his own in Africa/Niger BEFORE being picked for this mission??? Maybe we need to know that.

Otherwise it would seem that Plame may have lied extensively from the getgo as well.


8 posted on 10/28/2005 3:10:29 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: victim soul

Sometime after Novak's article, Wilson was on C-SPAM and said that he did not know who sent him to Niger, and that he would not know them if he met them on the street.


9 posted on 10/28/2005 3:11:56 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

And frankly, his second statement is more forceful than the first -- if anything.


10 posted on 10/28/2005 3:45:57 AM PDT by Cosmo (Liberalism is for girls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

later read


11 posted on 10/28/2005 4:38:28 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: victim soul

Frog March Bookmark.


12 posted on 10/28/2005 4:45:04 AM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Good reference material.

Be cautious of Annenberg and their so-called 'Factcheck.org'. They are a bunch of liberals, which means, in typical liberal fashion, that some of their facts are not facts at all. I caught FactCheck.Org using several misleading and false statement in an attempt to discredit the Swift Boat Veterans. The following is my letter to them:

Annenberg,

You need a fact check on your so-called "fact check".

You wrote, "There is reason to doubt the ad. For one thing, one of the men who appears in it, George Elliott, told the Boston Globe he had made a "terrible mistake" by accusing Kerry of not deserving one of his awards."

Not true. In fact, shortly after the Globe article, Elliot submitted an affidavit stating the author of the Globe article misquoted him and that Elliot stands by everything in the ad.

You wrote, "None of those in the attack ad by the Swift Boat group actually served on Kerry's boat. And their statements are contrary to the accounts of Kerry and those who served under him. "

That was very misleading. Steve Gardner, one of the swift boat members who was not in the ad, served on Kerry's boat as a machine gunner. Gardner strongly disputes the circumstances surrounding at least one of Kerry's medals.

You wrote, "...medical records provided by the Kerry campaign to FactCheck.org do not list Letson as the “person administering treatment” for Kerry’s injury on December 3, 1968 . The medical officer who signed this sick call report is J.C. Carreon, who is listed as treating Kerry for shrapnel to the left arm."

Wrong again. J.C. Carreon was not a medical officer. Dr. Letson treated Kerry. Carreon, an enlisted hospital corpsman who worked with Dr. Letson at the time, most likely completed the paperwork. It was common practice for enlisted men and women in the medical field to fill out the required record entries. I did when I served in the U. S. Navy medical and dental fields.

You wrote, "A group funded by the biggest Republican campaign donor in Texas began running an attack ad Aug. 5 ...".

If you are going to try to smear the swift boat veterans by pretending this is a partisan matter, then shouldn't you provide partisan references for the staff responsible for this so-called "fact check? For example, list those on your staff who have worked for, or for the election of, democratic politicians, and list your campaign donations. Shouldn't you also mention that the Boston Globe is an extremely partisan newspaper, and the reporter that wrote the bogus Elliot article, Michael Kranish, has strong ties to Kerry, and that Kranish currently has four books published or being published on Kerry and the Kerry campaign, including a Kerry biography?

You make a big deal out of McCain, as if he is in some way relevant. Read this carefully: MCCAIN WAS NOT THERE!

To see how partisan you sound, read these three paragraphs from the swift boat vets website:

"John Kerry has been able to convince about 13 men who served on Swift boats in the Mekong Delta to support him, 7 or 8 of whom were at various times crew members on his own 6-man boat. Those are the men the Kerry campaign so prominently featured at the Democratic Convention. The photograph we have posted at SwiftVets.com shows Kerry with 19 of his fellow Swift boat OICs (Officers In Charge) in Coastal Division 11. Four OICs were not present for the photograph. Only one of his 23 fellow OICs from Coastal Division 11 supports John Kerry.

Overall, more than 250 Swift boat veterans are on the record questioning Kerry's fitness to serve as Commander-in-Chief. That list includes his entire chain of command -- every single officer Kerry served under in Vietnam. The Kerry game plan is to ignore all this and pretend that the 13 veterans his campaign jets around the country and puts up in 5-star hotels really represent the truth about his short, controversial combat tour.

The Swift boats fought in groups, so the other OICs who fought alongside Kerry know him well and can accurately describe what he did and did not do. In many cases Kerry's fellow OICs had a better perspective than his own crew members, since the latter had no way to determine whether he was following orders and how well he worked with his peers. "

Frankly, this so-called "fact check" is little more than an attack ad for John Kerry. It contains all the DNC talking points, currently being printed in similar attack ads, disguised as journalism, by left-wing "newspapers" all over the nation. You are smearing over 250 brave Vietnam veterans in an attempt to provide aid and comfort to one of the lowest scoundrels ever to seek high public office.

Shame on you.

Note that Annenberg did make a few changes, including a mention of the disputed reporting on Elliot and Letson. But it is still a one-sided, major-league hit piece. See Republican-funded Group Attacks Kerry's War Record.

13 posted on 10/28/2005 5:24:26 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau ("The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God." -- Psalms 14:1, 53:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhilipFreneau

Yes, I'm familiar with the Annenberg Foundation and their political slant. It' was the hard dates and facts that make it somewhat valuable to me. I'll come back and read your letter to them later. Thanks.


14 posted on 10/28/2005 5:29:22 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rod1

I want to know who in the CIA above Wilson's wife gave the final approval for him to go and accepted Wilson's report?

It's pretty obvious even with the bias of Annenberg that the Vice President angered career CIA people as I recall him being blasted by going to Langley more than once and allegedly bullying the CIA analysts.

The CIA initiated the iinvestigation.


MMMM --


15 posted on 10/28/2005 6:05:43 AM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

bump


16 posted on 10/28/2005 6:13:15 AM PDT by meema (I am a Conservative Traditional Republican, NOT an elitist, sexist , cynic or right wing extremist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: victim soul
Yes, the "bullying analysts" canard. Three separate investigations looked into charges that Administration pressured the CIA into slanting its conclusions. All three found nothing to support it. Dr. Kay said he wished the problem had been political pressure because we know ho to fix that. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the President's blue-ribbon commission made multiple solicitations. One analyst said he'd been pressured on Cuba. Another said he thought the pressure he got made his work better.

On its face, it was an absurd charge - that the Administration pressured the CIA into repeating the same conclusions they had held for a dozen years.

Yet (D) politicians will make tha claim and their collaborators in the MSM will never bring up the mountain of evidence to the contrary.

17 posted on 10/28/2005 6:16:26 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
That is not "easing off his earlier statement", it is being completely consistent. Maybe they don't understand that the only time someone "committed a crime" is when they have "violated the law". Or maybe they think anyone who doesn't agree with leftist crackpot politics is committing a crime.

That's the way I see it as well. I think that what the MSM are grasping at is an intervening press conference on June 10, 2004, in which a reporter suggests that the President had flatly stated that he would fire "leakers", as opposed to those who had violated the law by leaking: June 10, 2004 – Bush is asked by a reporter, “[D]o you stand by your pledge to fire anyone found to have [who leaked the agent's name]?” Bush replies, “Yes. And that's up to the U.S. Attorney to find the facts.” ( President Bush Press Conference Following G-8 Summit, Savannah, GA, June 10, 2004). To you and I it would appear that the MSM reporters are "parsing" the President's words to their partisan advantage.

18 posted on 10/28/2005 8:44:23 AM PDT by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: victim soul

I'm not seeing any mention of Wilson website outing his own wife. Surely that is relevant here?


19 posted on 10/28/2005 8:51:10 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pawdoggie

The reporters are being Clintonian (surprise). They asked the President "Do you stand by your pledge". And the answer is yes.


20 posted on 10/28/2005 8:55:16 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson