Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exxon Mobil profit hits 9.92 billion dollars, biggest ever
Yahoo News (AFP) ^ | October 27, 2005 | Yahoo News

Posted on 10/27/2005 6:01:24 PM PDT by Wuli

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Exxon Mobil posted a quarterly profit to 9.92 billion dollars, the biggest in US corporate history, putting the oil industry in the spotlight over surging energy costs. ADVERTISEMENT

Revenues topped an unprecedented 100 billion dollars for Exxon Mobil on record oil and gas prices, even though the company took a hit from hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

The profit was the highest ever for a US corporation, analysts at rating firm Standard and Poor's said.

The Texas-based company, the world's largest petroleum firm, downplayed the results in the face of growing concerns in Congress and elsewhere about firms reaping windfall profits from record oil and gas prices.

"Our earnings in the third quarter reflect the impact of the relatively volatile industry environment on commodity prices and industry margins," chairman Lee Raymond said.

Despite concerns about skyrocketing fuel costs for consumers, Raymond said ......

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: exxon; exxonmobil; gasprices; oil; profits
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last
What does this mean?

It means a whole lot less than what the media (Today Show, et al) are going to make of it tomorrow morning.

Why?

On revenue of $100.7 billion a pretax profit of $9.92 billion represents a pretax profit margin of just 9.95%.

By comparison, Dell Computer's latest pretax profit margin was 9.18%, IBM 12.74%, GE 14.52%, Citibank 30.01%, JP Morgan 17.91%, Pfizer 15.54%, Berkshire Hathaway 9.72%, Viacom (CBS) -75.85% and big bad (sarcasm) Walmart 3.59%.

Can you call the Exxon profits excessive? No. But you can sure see why CBS would be complaining about them.

1 posted on 10/27/2005 6:01:25 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Viacom made 75.85% profit and I don't own any?


2 posted on 10/27/2005 6:04:14 PM PDT by BipolarBob (I'm really BagdadBob under the witness protection program.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

You just nailed the key stat right there. Exxon's profits only look gargantuan because of the scale they operate on. Most people who owned a mutual fund that only returned 9.95% during a Bull Market for stocks would not brag. Exxon only returning 9.95% on it's capital during a price spike in the commodity it sold is almost frightening. Excellent reason to consider shorting the stock.


3 posted on 10/27/2005 6:05:47 PM PDT by .cnI redruM (Because change is not something you talk into existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Dammit. I knew I should've invested in Exxon Mobil.


4 posted on 10/27/2005 6:05:50 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

They make less percentage wise on a gallon of gasoline than the government and the oil companies make the stuff.


5 posted on 10/27/2005 6:06:18 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Tom14
What frosts my @$$ is that I paid $40 a tank and the fcukers only netted 9.95%! That's almost effrontery. Louis the XV governed France with greater efficiency.
7 posted on 10/27/2005 6:09:37 PM PDT by .cnI redruM (Because change is not something you talk into existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

They're also just now getting to a 10% profit margin. How has it been since that happened?


8 posted on 10/27/2005 6:09:59 PM PDT by phatoldphart (Started in computers in 1967. Still can't type.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Tom14
Congratulations, newbie! You win a free ZOT!
10 posted on 10/27/2005 6:11:24 PM PDT by decal (Mother Nature and Real Life are conservatives; the Progs have never figured this out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Wuli
Hmmm..

Not permitted to drill.

Not allowed to build refineries.

hmmm... what to do... guess i keep the money as profit...

12 posted on 10/27/2005 6:13:52 PM PDT by drc43 (Judges... Judges... get it done, then we can discuss priorities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Louie didn't have government mandates and taxes that Exxon has. In fact, tea was thrown overboard for less.


13 posted on 10/27/2005 6:14:01 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
After Bush/Cheney/Rove/DeLay get their cut, it won't seem so impressive.

God bless capitalism.

14 posted on 10/27/2005 6:14:16 PM PDT by Flyer (The Internet, my dog and you ~ http://dahtcom.com/masoncam/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tom14

Take a bus, car-pool, ride a bike, walk ... but please stop whining.


15 posted on 10/27/2005 6:14:50 PM PDT by gotribe (Hillary: Accessory to rape)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Flyer

They'll have to get in line behind me.


16 posted on 10/27/2005 6:16:17 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
Can you call the Exxon profits excessive? No. But you can sure see why CBS would be complaining about them.

I hate to tell you, but I saw ALL the MSM networks, plus the cable news channels (Fox News, CNN & MSNBC) yammering about the evil, unprecedented oil profits on today's news. In fact, it rivaled the Mires news!

Every talking head had their upper lip curled (read snarl). These damned oil companies better find some PR people worth their profits to defend this socialist grab before it gets legs. Time to nip it in the tank, if you know what I mean.

17 posted on 10/27/2005 6:17:24 PM PDT by demkicker (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tom14

Tom, you are a fool and have no idea what you are talking about.

How much does it cost to drill and search for oil? What is the cost of government regulation? How much of this 'profit' is being turned directly into infrastructure and research?

ConocoPhillips is building a $20 billion gas pipeline to bring natural gas from Alaska to the lower 48. The high prices now will pay off greatly in the future.


18 posted on 10/27/2005 6:17:25 PM PDT by jbstrick ( I've never been to heaven, but I've been to Oklahoma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

EXACTLY.

Wall Street downgraded their stock on the news.


19 posted on 10/27/2005 6:17:44 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: drc43

A caller on Rush's show made the same point the other day. He said the oil companies' big revenues lead to these big, unseemly-looking profits because the oil companies can't sink the revenue into capital improvements as easily as other industries can. Why not? Because the government makes capital projects -- like building new refineries -- difficult to undertake thanks to all the regulations (environmental regs, etc.).


20 posted on 10/27/2005 6:19:09 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson