To describe dominance displays or bonding activity in animals as "homosexual" is also just wrong.
So called scientists have agendas and see what they want to see and filter observations of animial behavior in order to relate it to and justify human behavior when in fact species specific behavior has no bearing on standards for human behavior
Many species are cannibalistic and/or abandon their young at birth. Does that mean it would be natural and normal for humans to do so also?
Thats not my argument. I am not saying 'animals do it, so it must be okay'. I am saying that some animals exibit homosexual behavior.
To describe dominance displays or bonding activity in animals as "homosexual" is also just wrong.
I agree. Question - Would you consider dominance displays or bonding activity among humans to be homosexual? Ex. fraternity pranks, sports hazing, etc...?