[conserv13]

Many species are cannibalistic and/or abandon their young at birth. Does that mean it would be natural and normal for humans to do so also?

Thats not my argument. I am not saying 'animals do it, so it must be okay'. I am saying that some animals exibit homosexual behavior.

To describe dominance displays or bonding activity in animals as "homosexual" is also just wrong.

I agree. Question - Would you consider dominance displays or bonding activity among humans to be homosexual? Ex. fraternity pranks, sports hazing, etc...?

[Valpal1]

No, I don't, unless it escalates into homosexual rape.

I mostly consider fraternity pranks and hazing activities to be alcohol and drug induced brain farts.

That does not mean that a stealth fag or sadist won't insert themselves into these type of situations in order to take advantage of a situation, cause they will.

That animals may exhibit behavior that is interpreted by humans as "homosexual" does not mean that animals are homosexual or that the observing humans have a clue. I am extremely tired of the gay agenda of describing the non-normative situational behavior of zoo animals as proof of animal homsexuality.