Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Real Clear Politics SCOTUS short list
realclearpolitics.com ^ | 10/27/2005

Posted on 10/27/2005 11:13:19 AM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Supreme Court Nomination Short List

Samuel Alito Jr 

Age: 55

Education:

Princeton University, B.A, 1972
Yale Law School, J.D., 1975

Federal Judicial Service:
U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Nominated by George H.W. Bush on February 20, 1990. Confirmed by the Senate on April 27, 1990, and received commission on April 30, 1990.

Professional Career:

U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey, 1987-1990
Deputy Assistant U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1985-1987
Assistant to the U.S. Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1981-1985
Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, 1977-1981
Law Clerk, Hon. Leonard I. Garth, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, 1976-1977

Janice Rogers Brown

Age: 56

Education:
Cal State - Sacramento, B.A, 1974

UCLA Law School, J.D., 1977
University of Virginia, LL.M., 2004

Federal Judicial Service:
U. S. Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit
Nominated by George W. Bush in 2003. Confirmed by the
Senate on June 8, 2005 by a vote of 56-43.

Professional Career:
Justice, California Supreme Court, 1996 - 2005
Associate Justice of the Third District Court of Appeal in Sacramento, 1994-1996
Legal Affairs Secretary to Governor Pete Wilson, 1991-1994
Associate, Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor, 1990-1991

Dpty Secretary & General Counsel, Business, Transportation & Housing Agency, 1987-1990
Deputy Attorney General, CA Attorney General's Office, 1979-1987

Edith Brown Clement

Age: 57

Education:
University of Alabama, B.A, 1969
Tulane University, J.D., 1972

Federal Judicial Service:
U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Nominated by George W. Bush on September 4, 2001. Confirmed
by the Senate 99-0 on November 13, 2001

Professional Career:
Law Clerk to Hon. H. W. Christenberry U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana

Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre Associate & Partner

Miguel Estrada

Age: 44

Education:
Columbia College, B.A, 1983
Harvard Law School, J.D., 1986

Federal Judicial Service:
None
**Nominated in 2000 by President George W. Bush to fill a vacancy on the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit. Estrada

withdrew his nomination on September 4, 2003 after seven failed cloture votes.

Professional Career:
Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 2000-present
Assistant to the Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1992-1997
Associate, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, 1987-88, 1989-90, 1992

Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Sthrn District of New York, 1990-1992
Clerk, Honorable Anthony M. Kennedy, U.S. Supreme Court, 1988-1989
Clerk, Honorable Amalya L. Kearse, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1986-1987

Emilio Garza

Age: 58

Education:
University of Notre Dame, B.A., 1969
University of Notre Dame, M.A., 1970
University of Texas School of Law, J.D., 1976

Federal Judicial Service:
U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Nominated by George H.W. Bush on April 11, 1991. Confirmed by the Senate on May 24, 1991, and received commission on May 30, 1991.

U. S. District Court, Western District of Texas
Nominated by Ronald Reagan on February 2, 1988. Confirmed by the Senate on April 19, 1988, and received commission on April 20, 1988.

Professional Career:

Judge, 225th District Court, Bexar County, Texas, 1987-1988
Private practice, San Antonio, Texas, 1976-1987
U.S. Marine Corps Captain, 1970-1973

Alberto Gonzales

Age: 49

Education:
United States Air Force Academy, 1975-1977
Rice University, B.A., 1979

Harvard Law School, 1982

Federal Judicial Service:
None.

Professional Career:
Attorney General of the United States, 2005 - present
White House Counsel to President George W. Bush, 2001-2005

Associate Justice, Texas Supreme Court, 1999-2001
Texas Secretary of State, 1997-1999
General Counsel to Governor George W. Bush, 1995-1996
Partner, Vincent & Elkins, Houston, TX 1982-1994
United States Air Force, 1973-1975

Edith Jones

Age: 56


Education:
Cornell University, B.A., 1971
University of Texas School of Law, J.D., 1974

Federal Judicial Service:
U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Nominated by Ronald Reagan on February 27, 1985. Confirmed
by the Senate on April 3, 1985, and received commission on April 4, 1985.

Professional Career:
Private practice, Houston, Texas, 1974-1985

J. Michael Luttig 

Age: 51

Education:
Washington & Lee University, B.A., 1976

University of Virginia School of Law, J.D., 1981

Federal Judicial Service:
U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Nominated by George H.W. Bush on April 23, 1991. Confirmed by the Senate on July 26, 1991, and received commission on August 2, 1991.

Professional Career:
Counselor to the Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1990-1991

Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1990-1991
Principal Dpty Asst Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1989-1990
Private practice, Washington, DC, 1985-1989
Special Assistant to the Chief Justice, Supreme Court of United States, 1984-1985
Clerk, Chief Justice Warren Burger, Supreme Court of the United States, 1983-1984
Clerk, Hon. Antonin Scalia, U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, 1982-1983

Assistant Counsel, Office of the President of the United States, 1981-1982

Michael W. McConnell

Age: 50

Education:
Michigan State University, B.A., 1976
University of Chicago Law School, J.D., 1979

Federal Judicial Service:
U. S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Nominated by George W. Bush on September 4, 2001. Confirmed

by the Senate on November 15, 2002, and received commission on November 26, 2002.

Professional Career:
Professor, University of Utah College of Law, 1997-2002
Professor, University of Chicago Law School, 1985-1996
Assistant to the Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1983-1985
Assistant General Counsel, Office of Management and Budget, 1981-1983

Clerk, Associate Justice William J. Brennan, Supreme Court of the United States, 1980-1981
Clerk, Hon. J. Skelly Wright, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1979-1980

J. Harvie Wilkinson III

Age: 61

Education:
Yale University, B.A., 1967
University of Virginia School of Law, J.D., 1972

Federal Judicial Service:
U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Nominated by Ronald Reagan on January 30, 1984, to a seat vacated by John Decker Butzner, Jr.; Confirmed by the Senate on August 9, 1984, and received commission on August 13, 1984. Served as chief judge, 1996-2003.

Professional Career:
Professor, University of Virginia School of Law, 1983
Dpty Asst. U.S. Attorney General, Civil Rights Div, U.S. Department of Justice, 1982-1983
Editorial Page Editor, Norfolk Virginian-Pilot, 1978-1981
Associate Professor, University of Virginia School of Law, 1973-1978

Clerk, Justice Lewis F. Powell, Supreme Court of the United States, 1972-1973
Republican Candidate for U.S. House of Representatives from Virginia, 1970
U.S. Army, 1968-1969

Karen Williams

Age: 54

Education:
Columbia College, B.A., 1972
University of South Carolina Law Center, J.D., 1980

Federal Judicial Service:

U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Nominated by George H.W. Bush on January 27, 1992, to a seat vacated by Robert Foster Chapman; Confirmed by the Senate on February 27, 1992, and received commission on March 2, 1992.

Professional Career:
Private practice, Orangeburg, South Carolina, 1980-1992


Others Mentioned As Possible Supreme Court Nominees:
• Senator John Cornyn (R-TX)
• Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT)
• Ted Olson
• Priscilla Owen

• Larry Thompson




TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888

Its the senate RINOs and the McCain gang stopping a "pure play" pick here - that's why we got Miers the first time.

let's see McCain lead the charge to vote down one of the women mentioned on this thread. let's play it out.


61 posted on 10/27/2005 11:55:31 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

Luttig also was confirmed by a Dem senate. Anything in his opinions which would give the D's reason to filibuster?


62 posted on 10/27/2005 11:55:41 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
>>Bush is not a conservative. Bush is a Republican...

IF you stop there, you would seem to be contrasting conservatism and Republicans (I learned how to use the artful ellipsis by observing liberal treatment of texts in college).

IMO, the contrast is fine. Conservatives are forced to choose between Republican or Democrat, and generally go for the lesser of two evils, in some category or another. They are all statists, however.
63 posted on 10/27/2005 11:56:27 AM PDT by Apogee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

To: Lekker 1

Oh I agree! Bush was the less of two evils. The RATs are flaming Marxists, and Traitor Kerry would have accelerated the destruction that Bush is now doing to our nation.

Thank God Kerry or Gore (in 2000) was not elected!!

This does not ease the pain, however, in the realization that George Bush is NOT a conservative, and has been a disaster of galactic size proportions to the conservative cause.


65 posted on 10/27/2005 11:57:32 AM PDT by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
• Senator John Cornyn (R-TX)
• Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT)

Absolutely, hell no on these two.

66 posted on 10/27/2005 11:57:51 AM PDT by Centurion2000 ((Aubrey, Tx) --- America, we get the best government corporations can buy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: nyconse
I agree with your concerns. McVain and his gang of 7 Pubbies (actually more if you include the likes of Sphincter) are trying to be power brokers.

But, if Bush puts up someone like JRB in nomination, McVain and his gang of merrymen had better be ready, because THEY WILL BE PUT ON RECORD for their non-support. I truly believe there will be HELL to pay if they undermine a good solid nominee.

68 posted on 10/27/2005 11:59:28 AM PDT by el_texicano (Liberals, Socialist, DemocRATS, all touchy, feely, mind numbed robots, useless idiots all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

#####I do not see how we are going to get a real conservative through the rino and Dem senate. This was slap in the face to Bush and weakened him considerably.#####




The Miers nomination was itself a sign of weakness. Real liberals never have any trouble sailing through by votes ranging from 97-3 to 100-0. Why shouldn't President Bush be willing to fight for a good conservative?

You're correct that the left will try to block a good nominee, but we can win this **IF** we fight. The President was weakly and meekly trying to avoid a fight, but he shouldn't. He should welcome a fight. He needs a good fight with the far left to rally the base for 2006. If the leftists filibuster, force them to go 24/7 with it. If the RINOs balk, read them the riot act. If the 'Rats on the judiciary committee launch a smear campaign, then remind everyone about Chappaquiddick, Biden's plagiarism, and Chuckie's staff members stealing social security numbers. Fight fire with fire. More accurately, fight dishonest fire with honest fire. President Bush needs to take his case for his nominee over the heads of the Senate and directly to the people.



69 posted on 10/27/2005 12:02:01 PM PDT by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano

I'll be the first to admit, I absolutely relish the image of Janice Rogers Brown on national TV, being Borked and disrespected by a bunch of old, fat, white guys lecturing her on affirmative action, women's rights, and prayer.

If I were President Bush, I'd bait that hook in a minute. The Democrats have politically turned themselves into a one-trick pony: they need to win 90% of the African-American vote just to have a prayer of a chance to win a national election.

IMO, allowing a no-nonsense, tough-minded, eloquent, intelligent, devoutly religious conservative African-American to speak her mind will be a political disaster for Democrats. Her values and ideas will resonate; maybe not to elitist, esoteric legal scholars, but across the spectrum of rank-and-file African-American voters. An example is her "Whiter Shade of Pale" speech to the Federalist Society. Agree or disagree with it as you will, but that kind of reasoned rationale will make its mark on more than 10% of those who hear it, IMO.

In the past, the Democrats have been able to hold a 90% coalition together by dubious means - combining wild accusations of the white racist power structure (inflicting AIDS on people, bombing the levees, etc.) with out and out voter fraud in heavily African-American precincts. Winning a serious debate on judicial philosphy in front of millions of Americans is not part of that strategy, IMO.

And the GOP hardly has to win, all they need to do is show up. If the GOP ever figures how to pull another 5-10% from that 90%, it's game, set, and match. An opportunity to do so has fallen in the GOP's lap.

The caveat: She needs to be squeaky clean, because IMO, Democrats will undoubtedly try the scandal route (a la Clarence Thomas) rather than try to hold that 90% together by a serious debate on judicial philosophy.


70 posted on 10/27/2005 12:02:40 PM PDT by soxfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: KMJames
Do you think Bush IS NOT a conservative?

Considering that he has not acted like a Conservative on the most important issues facing us as a nation - more federal control in some areas, private property rights, illegal aliens/border security, reigning in government spending, pork barrel spending...

Some of these issues threaten the very foundation of this nation, as well as our national security.
71 posted on 10/27/2005 12:08:11 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
There is really only three on the list with Ivy League law degrees. The rest are riff raff from lesser schools. Since none of the Ivy League candidates are women I suggest we scrap the list and start over. /sarc
72 posted on 10/27/2005 12:11:42 PM PDT by oldbrowser (A living, breathing constitution is a usurpation of the people's sovereignty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

I was just thinking that the President could nominate Cornyn and then Governor Rick Perry of Texas could appoint Tom Delay to fill out Cornyn's term. Tom Delay in the Senate would be a delight!


73 posted on 10/27/2005 12:12:03 PM PDT by HateBill (Democratic Message: "Kiss Terrorist A*s" vs. Republican Message: "Kick Terrorist A*s")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stingy Dog

Olson is 65. Too old to have much lasting impact.


74 posted on 10/27/2005 12:20:59 PM PDT by The people have spoken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

OK, instead of keen I'll say I'm pissed off at Gonzales being AG......how's that? *~*


75 posted on 10/27/2005 12:27:55 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

He's not only great he'd probably be confirmed easily....and best of all, to the libs' chagrin...he he...he he


76 posted on 10/27/2005 12:38:10 PM PDT by Cosmo (Liberalism is for girls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
(williams) was appointed in 1992? by Clinton?

Bush I, the youngest of his appointments left on the bench, I believe

77 posted on 10/27/2005 1:06:24 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

My vote goes to Ted, also.


78 posted on 10/27/2005 1:14:35 PM PDT by UScbass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Janice Rogers Brown – she’s qualified, she’s an origionalist.

Democrats say she is out of the mainstream and a judicial activist. They say her decisions and speeches show her to be opposed to government (ie: government control of the economy) abortion (she’s opposed to killing unborn children as a form of birth control) and even hostile to civil rights (she thinks there is a difference between gay anal intercourse and child molestation and that neither of them if done in the privacy of one’s bedroom should be a constitutional right).

Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) remarked, "We are not going to turn back by appointing judges to lifetime positions who will bring us and return us back to those days of discrimination and prejudice." Back to the days when gay marriage was a crime and not a constitutional right, to the days when a liberal Senator from Massachusetts could get away with murder and there was no conservative media to turn a light of truth on that darkness; back to the days when a moment of silence wasn’t something that we thought might offend some atheist in the crowd; back to the days when pornography was punishable as a crime and not sponsored by government grants; back to the days when military personnel were honored for the sacrifice they made to protect ordinary Americans. Liberals do not want a judge appointed that will turn the clock back to a civilized time when family values meant a marriage between one man and one woman, when men were not wearing dresses and parading down Fifth Avenue in New York City, and the MSM was not pointing out how beautiful they look.

Janice Rogers Brown will not turn the clock back but she will stop the clock from ticking toward a godless nation like the failed USSR.

 

           

 

79 posted on 10/27/2005 1:15:34 PM PDT by street_lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888

There is no such thing as a conservative. There are Republicans, RATS and Lunatics. We know which group you are in.


80 posted on 10/27/2005 1:21:11 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson