Posted on 10/27/2005 11:04:04 AM PDT by Tarnsman
"He should reject the demands of a few extremists and choose a justice who will protect the constitutional rights of all Americans."
Huh?!? Naaaaaah, that's a typo. It should be:
"He should reject the demands of those who believe in the Constitution and listen to me and a few other extremists and choose a justice who will invent new constitutional rights for some Americans."There, fixed it for ya Harry. Much better now.
/s
The democrat motto......
I'm convinced now, that this was a set-up all along, to embarrass President Bush.
Poor Dirty Harry is sad! Him and the Gang of 14 don't get to pick the nominee anymore...
The nomination to the US Supreme Court is of far greater importance than some short term political squabble. It is about the philosophical make-up o fthe Court for the next 50 years, and whether we continue to get more Roe and Lawrence type decisions.
The fatal blow to her candidacy was the release of her 1993 speech. Read the pertinent excerpts. It is clear that her worldview is not in the mold of Scalia or Thomas; rather she has the Anthony Kennedy "autonomous self" point of view.
We were kidding ourselves and hoping that she was the type of Supreme Court Justice that Bush promised us in the campaign , which formed the basis for why we voted for him.
Don't worry about the Dems short term whining. If he now appoints a Scalia/Thomas-like justice as promised, this is a long term good thing.
Besides, Miers looked too much like the two comediennes on SNL.
Bottom line ----
Looks as though this was the plan all along.
I fail to see a screw up thus far.
Reid has to hold his pro-fillibuster coalition together. It wont be easy.
You're right. We should just do whatever the Democrats say. If we don't do what they say, we are playing into their hands.
Reed is telegraphing the fear of the Left: that Bush will now nominate a solid, proven conservative, and the greatly touted and cherished "division in the GOP" will suddenly evaporate.
BRING IT ON!
So give yourselves all a pat on the back, secure in the knowledge that by electing George Bush, we have given the Democrats a bat to beat over the head of the next nominee. Since the Democrats liked John McCain better, we should have elected him, right?
They are a shrinking, noisy minority!
acceptable to Reid, Leahey and the others
I hope you are incorrect.
A lot of so called conservatives want to "outdemocrat" the democrats. Personally that sounds like becoming a democrat to me.
If the Dems are going to make this a filibuster, they are going to lose. Any strategy that depends on raising the bar is not going to be popular politically.
Um...no.
And to each other.
We're all needlessly bloodied now, and the next nomineeno matter who it isis going to be bloodied even further.
I hope and pray we have not been penny wise and pound foolish. I'm glad that's over, but I am not looking forward to the consequences.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.