Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Next Woman Nominated to the Court: This Time, No Death of a Thousand Cuts
Special to FreeRepublic ^ | 29 October, 2005 | John Armor (Congressman Billybob)

Posted on 10/27/2005 10:22:03 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
To: Congressman Billybob; XJarhead
John, do you think JRB will be filibustered? Do you think the 'Rats and moderate Republicans will have 51 votes to defeat the "nucular" option?

If the answer to both questions is "yes", what is the point of starting a fight that we'll lose?

21 posted on 10/27/2005 10:36:47 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Lashed to the USS George W. Bush: Glub Glub Glub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
If the answer to both questions is "yes", what is the point of starting a fight that we'll lose?

One possibility, and I am just speculating, is that given W's current situation, to have a war with the Dems where the face of the Democratic party is Kennedy and Schumer might be very good for the GOP overall.

Also, don't forget, Reagan had Bork and Ginsburg, and that didn't hurt is presidency. I am not sure why everyone thinks it is such a disaster to have a Supreme Court nominee lose.

22 posted on 10/27/2005 10:38:44 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

I am Woman. Hear Me Roar. Senators, I Am Too Big To Ignore.


23 posted on 10/27/2005 10:38:59 AM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
John, do you think JRB will be filibustered?

I don't. The Dems are cowards. And they lie.

Do you think the 'Rats and moderate Republicans will have 51 votes to defeat the "nucular" option?

Won't be necessary.

24 posted on 10/27/2005 10:40:08 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
We're on the same page Billybob. Excellent contribution, as per usual. Let's just hope this or something like it reaches the proper eyes and hearts.

Nam Vet

25 posted on 10/27/2005 10:41:53 AM PDT by Nam Vet ("I was present at the birth of a political jihad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Also, don't forget, Reagan had Bork and Ginsburg, and that didn't hurt is presidency. I am not sure why everyone thinks it is such a disaster to have a Supreme Court nominee lose.

Blackmun.

26 posted on 10/27/2005 10:42:17 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Lashed to the USS George W. Bush: Glub Glub Glub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
From your mouth to God's ears.

I have already posted my thoughts on why JRB would be an excellenet strategic choice for Bush to make:

It'd be good poker of the highest order as

1) It'd force the Dems to attack a black female

2) Who was re-elected by large margins in the well-known bastion of right-wing extremism known as Kah-lee-four-nyah.

3) Who they have voted for mere months ago to confirm to a seat on the D.C. Circuit Court.

1 and 2 just make them look bad when they attack.

3 makes them look either stupid or hypocritical; they'll make verbal pretzels in the air explaining why she suddenly became a maybe from a yes.

27 posted on 10/27/2005 10:42:33 AM PDT by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
1992? Have I missed something?

Amendment XXVII

No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.

Written in the late 1700s, finally ratified in 1992. Read about it here

28 posted on 10/27/2005 10:42:51 AM PDT by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Was W's dad's claim that his nominee, Clarence Thomas, was most qualified "laughable" too?

Not as much so.

Why not?

29 posted on 10/27/2005 10:43:37 AM PDT by shhrubbery! (The 'right to choose' = The right to choose death --for somebody else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

I don't think the President or the Republican party can depend on any Republican in Congress to show any backbone and fight for the Presidents nomination.


30 posted on 10/27/2005 10:43:59 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Whether it is Judge Brown or some other woman judge, I feel strongly that this time the President will not make any effort to avoid a fight, but will put up a hard-wired judicial conservative.



Interesting take but I have a different view. I think the President will take the pragmatic approach and nominate someone that will be supported by at least enough of a mix from both sides of the aisle that confirmation will be secured without a knock down fight.

JMO and obviously yours differs.


31 posted on 10/27/2005 10:44:06 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

So we know which "Republicans" we need to defeat in primaries.


32 posted on 10/27/2005 10:44:09 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
more like nibbled to death by ducks.

Nominated for post of the day!

33 posted on 10/27/2005 10:44:40 AM PDT by ARealMothersSonForever (Proud to be named as a member of the Radical Right Wing. Vast Right Wing got old.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: George Smiley

She's the right woman at the right time.


34 posted on 10/27/2005 10:45:26 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
Coulter and Bork, perfect together.

Two bitter, rabid dogs.

35 posted on 10/27/2005 10:45:44 AM PDT by OldFriend (G-D IS NOT THE AUTHOR OF CONFUSION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
So we know which "Republicans" we need to defeat in primaries.

The idea that a John McCain or Olympia Snowe could be defeated in a primary is utterly ridiculous.

36 posted on 10/27/2005 10:45:59 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Lashed to the USS George W. Bush: Glub Glub Glub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Bush already has one RINO confirmed, appointed another one, and the next one will be one too.. Why?.. Rinoisimus Maximus is the name and the son of "read my lips" is the game.. thats why the boy is goin for a Dame..


37 posted on 10/27/2005 10:46:46 AM PDT by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

We might not get them all, but if we take out one or two, it would cause the rest to get a little antsy.


38 posted on 10/27/2005 10:47:38 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: shhrubbery!
Why not?

Just my opinion. Also, I don't recall the dynamics of the Thomas situation all that well. All I know is that the idea that Miers is the most qualified person for the Supreme Court is totally laughable.

39 posted on 10/27/2005 10:49:18 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger
I am a woman with plenty of bench experience and a lengthy paper trail. Maybe not the best qualified, but HEY I'm a woman !

We're just concerned that you might grow into a man in office.

40 posted on 10/27/2005 10:49:37 AM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson