Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: governsleastgovernsbest

>>Agreed, but Miers' pro-choice statements are so extreme that I have to believe that the WH was unaware of them at the time they made the representations to Dobson et. al about Miers' supposedly pro-life views.

It would just boggle the mind to think the Bush administration would have said what it apparently did while knowing she had made these statements. Like they say, not only would it have been wrongm, it would have been stupid.<<

If the White House called with glowing recommendations to both Sekulow and Dobson, which they did, since both these good men took their word on good faith and endorsed Miers....and the White House did NOT do any research and find out about these views, it shows glaring incompetence and recklessness on the part of the administration.

And it blows the whole "I'm just gonna trust the President" theory to smithereens.


27 posted on 10/26/2005 6:00:11 PM PDT by SerpentDove (If Miers is pro-life, why are Harry Reid, Ellen Goodman and Susan Estrich supporting her?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: SerpentDove
If the White House called with glowing recommendations to both Sekulow and Dobson, and the White House did NOT do any research and find out about these views, it shows glaring incompetence and recklessness on the part of the administration.

And it blows the whole "I'm just gonna trust the President" theory to smithereens.

Excellent points. If either Dobson or Sekulow were to make a statement tomorrow pulling their support, the nomination would be withdrawn within 24 hours. I hope it happens.

32 posted on 10/26/2005 6:10:19 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (read my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson