Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Demonizing Condi - 345pm EDT flash: THE PHOTO HAS BEEN REMOVED from USA Today's Site
Michelle Malkin ^ | Wed. Oct. 26th 2005 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 10/26/2005 12:53:24 PM PDT by ajolympian2004

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

1 posted on 10/26/2005 12:53:25 PM PDT by ajolympian2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

That must've been when she was putting the ZOT on Senator Boxer the other day.


2 posted on 10/26/2005 12:55:23 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

Condi is a Tok'ra operative and proof that the Stargate program is real.


3 posted on 10/26/2005 12:55:36 PM PDT by Rebelbase (""As far as I can tell, she (Miers) is every bit as conservative as George Bush." --NCsteve (FR))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

Media once again gets caught red handed, should I say.....Staging the News????

Oh the gnashing of teeth, snarling, sneering and snot slinging had this been on FOX or a conservative website.

So damned typical.


4 posted on 10/26/2005 12:55:37 PM PDT by armydawg1 (" America must win this war..." PVT Martin Treptow, KIA, WW1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

I'd say the lady was pretty POed at someone. I have seen that look on my wife's face when I have screwed up. :-)


5 posted on 10/26/2005 12:55:51 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Socialist Dems, the MSM and Islamic murderers, ALL threats to the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

I was thinking she has a Goa'uld.


6 posted on 10/26/2005 12:56:22 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

I don't believe anything else USA Today says, so why should I believe them when they give a lame explanation for their blatant dishonesty in this case?


7 posted on 10/26/2005 12:56:24 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

Ga'ould?


8 posted on 10/26/2005 12:56:46 PM PDT by NYFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
From USA Today's website:

Editor's note: The photo of Condoleezza Rice that originally accompanied this story was altered in a manner that did not meet USA TODAY's editorial standards. The photo has been replaced by a properly adjusted copy. Photos published online are routinely cropped for size and adjusted for brightness and sharpness to optimize their appearance. In this case, after sharpening the photo for clarity, the editor brightened a portion of Rice's face, giving her eyes an unnatural appearance. This resulted in a distortion of the original not in keeping with our editorial standards.
9 posted on 10/26/2005 12:57:56 PM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (11, 175, 77, 93 - In Memory Always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

Who says the MSM have no shame?!

They have at least a trace, evidently.


10 posted on 10/26/2005 12:58:09 PM PDT by headsonpikes (The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1

They;re so unbiased. Not.


11 posted on 10/26/2005 12:58:25 PM PDT by knightshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
It looks like what they did was use a Photoshop filter called 'unsharp mask.'It refers to an old photograph technique of offsetting negatives (or something like that) to emphasize the edges between colors or shades.

No, they used the majic wand tool to select the whites of her eyes and changed it from an off white to a bright white.

12 posted on 10/26/2005 12:59:50 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

bttt


13 posted on 10/26/2005 1:00:09 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Actual, unretouched photo.

14 posted on 10/26/2005 1:00:44 PM PDT by martin_fierro (My other car is a Tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

Sad how the left wing media will resort to such nonsense to demonize the President and his staff.

I think it's funny in some ways. Here is a medium controlled by the liberal, socialist, "all-inclusive" party of the people; yet they can't stand the fact that a woman (who is not only attractive, but SMART too) can be Secretary of State....and a darn good one too.

Well, I guess I'll add the USA Today to my ever growing list of publications I won't read.


15 posted on 10/26/2005 1:01:14 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
Another thread here.
16 posted on 10/26/2005 1:01:56 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

Condi Reich enjoys demonizing Israel, so I have no sympathy.


17 posted on 10/26/2005 1:02:09 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
"Unsharp mask" my eye.

What? An unsharp mask and a brightness/contrast control filter just on her *eyes*?

Sure.

18 posted on 10/26/2005 1:02:10 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

Hot damn. I sent the editor Michelle Malkin fingered on the deal a nice little email. Basically I said they should stick to reporting the news, not creating it. I also stated the internet is an open source for news and that these sort of distortions and manipulations will not pass without strong protest.

This is good news. Some snot nosed punk newbie out of journalism school thinks he/she's being cute and clever. Once the boss gets an email box full of attack mail I imagine that little snot nose is getting an earful.


19 posted on 10/26/2005 1:03:04 PM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded
the editor brightened a portion of Rice's face, giving her eyes an unnatural appearance. This resulted in a distortion of the original not in keeping with our editorial standards.

So, an EDITOR is not in keeping with their EDITORIAL standards, eh?

20 posted on 10/26/2005 1:03:30 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson