Skip to comments.
Demonizing Condi - 345pm EDT flash: THE PHOTO HAS BEEN REMOVED from USA Today's Site
Michelle Malkin ^
| Wed. Oct. 26th 2005
| Michelle Malkin
Posted on 10/26/2005 12:53:24 PM PDT by ajolympian2004
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To: ajolympian2004
That must've been when she was putting the ZOT on Senator Boxer the other day.
To: ajolympian2004
Condi is a Tok'ra operative and proof that the Stargate program is real.
3
posted on
10/26/2005 12:55:36 PM PDT
by
Rebelbase
(""As far as I can tell, she (Miers) is every bit as conservative as George Bush." --NCsteve (FR))
To: ajolympian2004
Media once again gets caught red handed, should I say.....Staging the News????
Oh the gnashing of teeth, snarling, sneering and snot slinging had this been on FOX or a conservative website.
So damned typical.
4
posted on
10/26/2005 12:55:37 PM PDT
by
armydawg1
(" America must win this war..." PVT Martin Treptow, KIA, WW1)
To: ajolympian2004
I'd say the lady was pretty POed at someone. I have seen that look on my wife's face when I have screwed up. :-)
5
posted on
10/26/2005 12:55:51 PM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(Socialist Dems, the MSM and Islamic murderers, ALL threats to the Republic!)
To: Rebelbase
I was thinking she has a Goa'uld.
6
posted on
10/26/2005 12:56:22 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: ajolympian2004
I don't believe anything else USA Today says, so why should I believe them when they give a lame explanation for their blatant dishonesty in this case?
7
posted on
10/26/2005 12:56:24 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: ajolympian2004
8
posted on
10/26/2005 12:56:46 PM PDT
by
NYFriend
To: ajolympian2004
From USA Today's website:
Editor's note: The photo of Condoleezza Rice that originally accompanied this story was altered in a manner that did not meet USA TODAY's editorial standards. The photo has been replaced by a properly adjusted copy. Photos published online are routinely cropped for size and adjusted for brightness and sharpness to optimize their appearance. In this case, after sharpening the photo for clarity, the editor brightened a portion of Rice's face, giving her eyes an unnatural appearance. This resulted in a distortion of the original not in keeping with our editorial standards.
9
posted on
10/26/2005 12:57:56 PM PDT
by
Eagle of Liberty
(11, 175, 77, 93 - In Memory Always)
To: ajolympian2004
Who says the MSM have no shame?!
They have at least a trace, evidently.
10
posted on
10/26/2005 12:58:09 PM PDT
by
headsonpikes
(The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
To: armydawg1
They;re so unbiased. Not.
To: ajolympian2004
It looks like what they did was use a Photoshop filter called 'unsharp mask.'It refers to an old photograph technique of offsetting negatives (or something like that) to emphasize the edges between colors or shades. No, they used the majic wand tool to select the whites of her eyes and changed it from an off white to a bright white.
To: ajolympian2004
13
posted on
10/26/2005 1:00:09 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: ajolympian2004

Actual, unretouched photo.
14
posted on
10/26/2005 1:00:44 PM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(My other car is a Tagline.)
To: ajolympian2004
Sad how the left wing media will resort to such nonsense to demonize the President and his staff.
I think it's funny in some ways. Here is a medium controlled by the liberal, socialist, "all-inclusive" party of the people; yet they can't stand the fact that a woman (who is not only attractive, but SMART too) can be Secretary of State....and a darn good one too.
Well, I guess I'll add the USA Today to my ever growing list of publications I won't read.
To: ajolympian2004
16
posted on
10/26/2005 1:01:56 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: ajolympian2004
Condi Reich enjoys demonizing Israel, so I have no sympathy.
To: ajolympian2004
"Unsharp mask" my eye.
What? An unsharp mask and a brightness/contrast control filter just on her *eyes*?
Sure.
To: Kerretarded
Hot damn. I sent the editor Michelle Malkin fingered on the deal a nice little email. Basically I said they should stick to reporting the news, not creating it. I also stated the internet is an open source for news and that these sort of distortions and manipulations will not pass without strong protest.
This is good news. Some snot nosed punk newbie out of journalism school thinks he/she's being cute and clever. Once the boss gets an email box full of attack mail I imagine that little snot nose is getting an earful.
To: Kerretarded
the editor brightened a portion of Rice's face, giving her eyes an unnatural appearance. This resulted in a distortion of the original not in keeping with our editorial standards. So, an EDITOR is not in keeping with their EDITORIAL standards, eh?
20
posted on
10/26/2005 1:03:30 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson