Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutor Meets With Chief Judge Could Signal That Fitzgerald Is Seeking Extension
New York Sun ^ | 10-26-05 | JOSH GERSTEIN

Posted on 10/26/2005 12:10:24 PM PDT by inpajamas

WASHINGTON—The federal prosecutor investigating the alleged involvement of White House officials in the leak of a CIA operative's identity spent most of the lunch hour today meeting with the chief judge of the federal district court in the nation's capital, Judge Thomas Hogan.

As reporters massed outside an elevator lobby leading to the grand jury rooms, the special prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, apparently slipped out a back exit to conduct the noontime meeting with Judge Hogan.

Mr. Fitzgerald declined to comment as he and a colleague emerged from the judge's chambers just before 1 p.m.

The prosecutor's visit to the chief judge could signal that Mr. Fitzgerald is seeking to extend the term of the grand jury that has been investigating the leak. Judge Hogan would need to approve any extension to the grand jury's term, which was set to expire on Friday....

(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: cia; cialeak; leak; liddy; plame; rove; wilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161 next last
To: lugsoul
"It's a shame you didn't read the parts of those reports that said neighbors were not being interviewed for the first time. Or maybe you did read them, but chose not to remember them because they are inconvenient."

Randomly interviewing neighbors seems kind of a silly approach. In today's world, neighbors often don't know squat about what their neighbors do for a living. It would be more pertinent to questions friends and associates and reporters. Fitz should have subpoened the reporters who were making claims that they heard about Plame before this story broke.
121 posted on 10/26/2005 1:30:18 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Well, generally speaking I don't know where any of neighbors work, except for one who happens to write for the ComPost. If I did know that my neighbor worked at the CIA however, that would make it a very open secret.


122 posted on 10/26/2005 1:32:50 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
It has been a while since I last dealt with a case involving a Federal GJ, but the last time I was I was put under a lot of pressure to make my client decide whether to be a nice guy and cooperate or not. (He didn't; the AUSA didn't know he had terminal lung cancer-- he died a few months later.) The ostensible reason was the near expiration of the GJ term. I said "Ask for an extension" and was told that in that District (Central District CA) extensions were "strongly disfavored" by the District Court.

Still, a new grand jury could be convened at a later term, testimony from the previous GJ could be read in front of the new GJ, and indictments issued on that basis, unless something has changed.
123 posted on 10/26/2005 1:36:59 PM PDT by gypsylea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: doesnt suffer fools gladly

I heard W picked him? True? UGH, if so, hasn't he learned anything over the 5+years he has been dealing with the EVIL RATS at the WH? NEVER, ever trust a RAT, NOT even if your life depends on it.......FREAKIN NEVER!!


124 posted on 10/26/2005 1:37:30 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas
Can the prosecutor meet alone with the judge, or is that considered ex parte communication?
125 posted on 10/26/2005 1:38:49 PM PDT by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas
See a judge seeking extension? A few bucks at your local hardware store. Sheesh!


126 posted on 10/26/2005 1:41:50 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

If that is true I would have to agree. I hope the judge just says no and tells Fitzgerald to close up shop. No indictments, unless they want to indict Joe Wilson for playing "footsie" with French intelligence.

Hey, somebody told Wilson what was in the "forged" documents. Remember he testified that he saw them but the Senate revealed that he did not see them. So how did he know what was in them? What are the odds of Wilson being indicted. Hmm...somewhere between zero and none.


127 posted on 10/26/2005 1:42:53 PM PDT by daviscupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gypsylea
I said "Ask for an extension" and was told that in that District (Central District CA) extensions were "strongly disfavored" by the District Court.

If he did ask for an extension, absent new and startling facts, I hope the judge told him two years of this nonsense is enough!

128 posted on 10/26/2005 1:42:56 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas

This case should have been wrapped up in the first week...


129 posted on 10/26/2005 1:43:08 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
If I did know that my neighbor worked at the CIA however, that would make it a very open secret.

There are lots of people who work for the CIA and aren't covert. I know people who work at the CIA and are not covert, although they don't go around bragging about it or anything. The covert ones say they are consultans at some shell company.

130 posted on 10/26/2005 1:43:31 PM PDT by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

I'm just impressed that you can make that call without knowing any more than 10% of the pertinent facts.


131 posted on 10/26/2005 1:43:57 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

Being one who sees the dark lining in every cloud, you might be right.

I hate to think what if Cheney and/or Bush
were named as unindicted co-conspirators if indictments were handed up against Libby or Rove.

The administration needs to be involved in governing and defending the nation instead of dealing with endless legal attacks in court, Congress, and the MSM.

We might be seeing the last opportunity for conservatives to right the course of the nation being squandered. It is
a shame that hatred from the Dems,the Left,and the MSM have tuned a mole hill into a mountain.


132 posted on 10/26/2005 1:44:08 PM PDT by buckalfa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

The fact that it was random would be an assumption on your part, wouldn't it?


133 posted on 10/26/2005 1:45:23 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: conserv13

I was trying to get to the fact that people don't generally know what their neighbors do anymore. I was shocked a couple of months ago when an investigator showed up here at my office to interview me about one of my neighbors - his clearance was being reviewed. I didn't know he had a clearance nor that he worked for the government.


134 posted on 10/26/2005 1:46:09 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas

Next he'll be shopping for another grand jury like Ronnie Earle did THREE times before finding one dumb enough and Democrat enough to indict DeLay.


135 posted on 10/26/2005 1:47:10 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas
Why do you need more than 18 months investigating a crime that is not a crime. Valarie was not a secret agent to start with. Maybe he is getting permission to issue a report which is never done after an investigation is closed. This is going to end with nada on Friday.

Pray for W and Our Troops

136 posted on 10/26/2005 1:49:18 PM PDT by bray (Iraq, freed from Saddamn now Pray for Freedom from Mohammad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gypsylea

Lugsoul keeps reiterating that Fitz had a slam-dunk case on the initial "outing" charge over a year ago, and that all he needed to tidy things up was the testimony of Miller and Cooper. Well, Miller and Cooper testified, but Fitz still seems to be at loose ends with his "slam-dunk" case and "voluminous" damning testimony that the judges referred to so long ago. In one of his briefs, Fitz mentioned that the investigation had taken an "unexpected turn." Some of us hope that means he might have latched on to the CIA hijinks and the politicization of classified material on the part of the anti-Bush faction, but that would be almost too good to be true. It could mean he is trying to nail everyone who ever uttered the name of Valery Plame as part of some huge conspiracy.


137 posted on 10/26/2005 1:51:57 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

I think the meeting with the judge today was routine and that no extension is necessary.

From all appearances, Fitz personally hand delivered the sealed indictment against Rove to his attorney this afternoon.


138 posted on 10/26/2005 1:52:25 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
"The fact that it was random would be an assumption on your part, wouldn't it?"

Yep, just like the assumption that Plame was "outed" to "silence" Wilson.
139 posted on 10/26/2005 1:53:52 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
"From all appearances, Fitz personally hand delivered the sealed indictment against Rove to his attorney this afternoon."

If so, it must be for something Rove did that hasn't been reported yet, or has been misreported. If, "Oh, I heard that too" can get you a federal rap, we live in a very dangerous political climate.
140 posted on 10/26/2005 1:57:21 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson