Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AFPhys

We aren't gaining anything now with the current status quo either... so should we just sit here and take it? I think not.

If it's such a concern for you, I suggest that you get on the phone to the RNC and the elected officials in Congress and let them know that the gun owners are fed up. They've had 11 years to do something since we the gun owners gave them Congress and they have done NOTHING. We have given them 19 years after we were stabbed in the back in 1986 to fix the screw up that Reagan signed his name to and we have seen nothing. More and more gun owners are becoming upset at the lack of action by the people WE got elected.

Sure, the firearm manufacturers protection act was a good move but what did it give us, the gun owners? Not much really. We still got stabbed in the back with BS amendments and studies. We're tired of it. More and more gun owners are sitting out elections or writing in protest votes... case in point, watch what happens in the Governors race in Virginia on the 8th.

The President won by a slim margin in the last election... what do you think is going to happen if gun owners keep getting ignored? We are the most crucial voting block in the Republican party yet, we are considered the red headed step child so to speak.

We aren't fools, we are sending a message. We are tired of the status quo.

The "Demdogs" as you like to call them know that gun control has cost them dearly. They are moving away from it and they intend to court the gun owners by introducing legislation to increase the chances of getting Warner elected as President in 2008. But that is okay, keep the status quo and I'm sure that the gun owners will stick with the Republicans...(/sarcasm)

You ask for legislation proposed by Democrats... okay. How about a repeal of the 1968 GCA introduced in 1971? I forget who introduced it but I know it was a democrat. It got squashed by the Republicans in committee. Yes, that's right, the Republicans voted against it.

Listen, I understand your fear of the Dems winning. I have the same fear but the gun owners are just tired of getting out and working our butts off for campaigns and voting on empty promises.

The 2008 Presidential election is most likely going to be a match between Allen and Warner. If that election were held today, the gun vote would go to Warner giving him the win. Allen is good on the 2nd Amendment but Warner has proven himself better. Allen MUST author some serious pro-gun legislation and he MUST get it passed and signed into law...

A few examples of stuff that would give him a big win would be:

1. Nationwide CCW.
2. Repeal of the 1986 MG ban.
3. Repeal all mention of "sporting purpose" in gun law.
4. Create a burden of proof for accusations of domestic violence for the Lautenburg act.
5. Allow surplus M14 rifles to be sold through CMP to the citizens of the US.

Those 5 alone would give him a huge advantage against Warner. However, if he helped to push to get the 2nd Amendment incorporated under the 14th Amendment, he'd ensure his victory.

But you just keep the status quo... We will take our votes elsewhere.

Mike


204 posted on 10/28/2005 6:43:50 AM PDT by BCR #226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]


To: BCR #226
Looks to me like the Republicans earn a solid C, Dems a solid F

United States Senate
 Gun Owners of America Scorecards for 108th, 107th, 106th Congress -
 My consolidation... leaving out "-" & "+" ... 
       [ I may have made a few errors - sorry if so]
? = "not rated" (why??? - especially Edwards- three times!!? and Nelson 2x)
       it is quite odd to me that D's managed to be unrated five times as much as R's...

ALABAMA   ALASKA
SESSIONS
SHELBY
R CCC
R BBB
  MURKOWSKI
STEVENS
R ?CC
R DDC
 
ARIZONA   ARKANSAS
KYL
McCAIN
R CCC
R FCC
  PRYOR
LINCOLN
HUTCHINSON
D  ?**
D FFF
R  *BC
 
CALIFORNIA   COLORADO
BOXER
FEINSTEIN
D FFF
D FFF
  ALLARD
CAMPBELL
R BBB
R BBB
 
CONNECTICUT   DELAWARE
DODD
LIEBERMAN
D FFF
D FFF
  BIDEN
CARPER
ROTH
D FFF
D FF*
R  **F
 
FLORIDA   GEORGIA
GRAHAM
NELSON
MACK
D F ?F
D ??*
R  **C
  MILLER
CHAMBLISS
CLELAND
COVERDELL
D   ??*
R  A**
D  *FF
R   **B
 
HAWAII   IDAHO
AKAKA
INOUYE
D FFF
D FFF
  CRAIG
CRAPO
R BBB
R BBB
 
ILLINOIS   INDIANA
DURBIN
FITZGERALD
D FFF
R  FFF
  LUGAR
BAYH
R FFF
D FFF
 
IOWA   KANSAS
GRASSLEY
HARKIN
R CCC
D FFF
  BROWNBACK
ROBERTS
R BBB
R CCC
 
KENTUCKY   LOUISIANA
BUNNING
McCONNELL
R BBB
R CCC
  BREAUX
LANDRIEU
D FFF
D FFF
 
MAINE   MARYLAND
COLLINS
SNOWE
R DDD
R CCC
  MIKULSKI
SARBANES
D FFF
D FFF
 
MASSACHUSETTS   MICHIGAN
KENNEDY
KERRY
D FFF
D FFF
  STABENOW
LEVIN
ABRAHAM
D FF*
D FFF
R  **D
 
MINNESOTA   MISSISSIPPI
DAYTON
COLEMAN
WELLSTONE
GRAMS
D FF*
R B**
D  *FF
R   **B
  COCHRAN
LOTT
R DDC
R CCC
 
MISSOURI   MONTANA
TALENT
BOND
CARNAHAN
ASHCROFT
R B**
R CCC
D  *F*
R  **C
  BAUCUS
BURNS
D FFD
R BBB
 
NEBRASKA   NEVADA
HAGEL
NELSON
R CCC
D FFF
  ENSIGN
REID
BRYAN
R BB*
D FFF
D  **F
 
NEW HAMPSHIRE   NEW JERSEY
GREGG
SUNUNU
SMITH
R CCC
R B**
R  *AA
  LAUTENBERG
CORZINE
TORRICELLI
D F*
D ??F
D *FF
 
NEW MEXICO   NEW YORK
BINGAMAN
DOMENICI
D FFF
R DDD
  SCHUMER
CLINTON
D FFF
D FFF
 
NORTH CAROLINA   NORTH DAKOTA
EDWARDS
DOLE
HELMS
D ???
R D**
R  *CC
  CONRAD
DORGAN
D FFF
D FFF
 
OHIO   OKLAHOMA
DEWINE
VOINOVICH
R FFF
R DDD
  INHOFE
NICKLES
R AAA
R BBB
 
OREGON   PENNSYLVANIA
SMITH
WYDEN
R DDD
D FFF
  SANTORUM
SPECTER
R CCC
R CCC
 
RHODE ISLAND   SOUTH CAROLINA
CHAFEE
REED
R FFF
D FFF
  HOLLINGS
GRAHAM
THURMOND
D FFF
R B**
R  *CC
 
SOUTH DAKOTA   TENNESSEE
DASCHLE
JOHNSON
D FFF
D FFF
  FRIST
ALEXANDER
THOMPSON
R DDD
R C**
R  *BB
 
TEXAS   UTAH
CORNYN
HUTCHISON
GRAMM
R ?**
R BBB
R  *BB
  BENNETT
HATCH
R DDD
R CCC
 
VERMONT   VIRGINIA
JEFFORDS
LEAHY
D DDD
D FFF
  ALLEN
WARNER
ROBB
R CC*
R FFF
D  **F
 
WASHINGTON   WEST VIRGINIA
CANTWELL
MURRAY
GORTON
D FF*
D FFF
R  **C
  BYRD
ROCKEFELLER
D FFF
D FFF
 
WISCONSIN   WYOMING
FEINGOLD
KOHL
D FFF
D FFF
  ENZI
THOMAS
R AAA
R BBB





CONSOLIDATION:
SENATE
#As
#Bs
#Cs
#Ds
#Fs
#?s
CumAvg.
DEMODOGS
0
0
0
4
131
11
0.03
REPUBLICANS
9
37
62
27
17
2
1.96

Looks to me like the Republicans earn a solid C, Dems a solid F

I would certainly like to see a higher score, but you're not going to ever convince me you'll do so by electing more Demodogs.

We have to work harder to get ever more conservative Republicans in the Red States, and to replace any and all Demodogs with any R - even solid RINOs like the Maine gals yield far higher positive results than ANY D, the highest rated of whom (Jumpin'JimJeff) rises to exactly a "D" rating.  Without my including him in the Dem's score, they would only have a single incident above an "F" and a 0.01 cume!

Please say uncle on this! I spent a lot of time making this consolidation for you and others.

The most important thing we must do is to get a president who will select USSC justices who will eventually strike the gun laws down as unConstitutional.  That is not going to be Hitlery or any other Demodog, including the one you chose in your remarks. (Allen is FAR more likely to select a strict constructionist for the court - NO Dem pres is ever going to nominate such a conservative justice!)  The Senate is also at least somewhat important in this effort because of the confirmation process, but not nearly as critical as the Presidency and the USSC.




205 posted on 10/28/2005 10:35:19 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson