Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Case against aides (doesn't have leg to stand on. (Valerie Plame case) (MUST READ: NO CRIME)
Chicago Sun Times ^ | Oct. 25, 2005 | MICHAEL BARONE

Posted on 10/25/2005 9:11:39 PM PDT by FairOpinion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 next last
To: Howlin
You've been here 90 minutes and already it's "we?"

LOL and noted.

81 posted on 10/25/2005 10:29:28 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

An Arkansas grand jury was ready to indict Hillary Clinton and Ken Star Balked. He thought it was to political. Does Fitz want to follow the right or wrong path?


82 posted on 10/25/2005 10:34:06 PM PDT by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
2 & 3

Thanks, that's where I am as well.

83 posted on 10/25/2005 10:34:57 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy

check this post out

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1509335/posts?page=14#14


84 posted on 10/25/2005 10:36:25 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Telling him, 'don't print that story' would have been pretty clear confirmation, now wouldn't it?

Further, the CIA says they asked Novak not to publish it, and they've barred Plame from talking about what she did for national security reasons.

Sorry, I'm not buying the idea she wasn't undercover and the CIA and DOJ are just going wild with this whole thing.


85 posted on 10/25/2005 10:39:16 PM PDT by Brillo_Breaks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Brimack34

Fitz is acting as if not remembering is a crime,if a Republican doesn't remember, but it was OK for Bill and Hillary to "not remember" things.

"Legal sources say he studied inconsistencies and forgotten facts from witnesses, including Rove, whose early testimony differed from Cooper's recollections. Rove, who spoke to the grand jury four times, changed his story after failing to mention that he discussed Wilson and his wife with the Time correspondent."

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002579643_fitzgerald24.html


86 posted on 10/25/2005 10:41:39 PM PDT by FairOpinion (CA Props: Vote for Reform: YES on 73-78, NO on 79 & 80, NO on Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

And all this from a grand jury leak on a leak case. I am confused as heck.


87 posted on 10/25/2005 10:45:50 PM PDT by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Brillo_Breaks

Another interesting article about how "covert" Valerie was --- NOT, examining the specifics.

How Covert Was Valerie Plame?

http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2005/10/how_covert_was_.html


And no matter how you want to claim she was covert, the IIPA is very clear and definite and the FACT is that Plame was NOT serving abroad and haven't for at least 5 years.

"Intelligence Identities Protection Act. To violate it, you must disclose the name of a covert agent who has served abroad within the last five years, while knowing that that person was a covert agent. It does not appear that Plame was a covert agent who had served abroad within five years of the disclosure of her name to reporter "


88 posted on 10/25/2005 10:49:24 PM PDT by FairOpinion (CA Props: Vote for Reform: YES on 73-78, NO on 79 & 80, NO on Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

You're wasting your time with that.

That one, IMO, is posting from either the CIA, the DNC, or Fitzgerald's office.


89 posted on 10/25/2005 10:51:56 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Peach

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1508920/posts?page=42#42

see post 42 here...


90 posted on 10/25/2005 10:53:21 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Understand islam understand evil - read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free pdf see link My Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

More like the DNC. ;)


91 posted on 10/25/2005 10:53:44 PM PDT by FairOpinion (CA Props: Vote for Reform: YES on 73-78, NO on 79 & 80, NO on Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Now that's interesting. During the Clinton investigation the media and Clinton's people made it a circus...now we just have the media filling that role. Behind the scenes there seem to be some top notch people...and I will not be at all surprised if they land in a different place than where the media expects to greet them.


92 posted on 10/25/2005 10:59:33 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Peach
What I've never understood is how Wilson knew about the forged documents so many months before it was known the documents were forged.

He had lunch with Dan Rather.

93 posted on 10/25/2005 11:00:08 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

remember this folks,, Barone was the only one who saw the truth on election night 2004,, the guy's sharp

he and Fred Barnes are the best


94 posted on 10/25/2005 11:46:17 PM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

do we know who all has been called before this grand jury? wilson, cia people, others?


95 posted on 10/25/2005 11:50:29 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

I think it was mostly Bush admin people -- they had Rove in front of the grand jury some four times.

It's a witch hunt.


96 posted on 10/26/2005 12:28:55 AM PDT by FairOpinion (CA Props: Vote for Reform: YES on 73-78, NO on 79 & 80, NO on Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Brillo_Breaks
We need to get our heads around this now...

[ Tonto voice ]
"Who's this we, White Man?"
[ / Jay Silverheels ]

97 posted on 10/26/2005 12:32:26 AM PDT by backhoe (A Nuke for every Kook- what a Clinton "legacy...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

There is an extraordinary amount of real, exagerrated, or fabricated leak stories being released by the MSM ahead of these indictments (or non-indictment). I believe these leaks may be intended to 1) put pressure on Fitz to indict or else look like he caved into pressure from the Bushies, and 2) create the false impression that Bush's people actually broke the law so that this case still damages Bush and the GOP if Fitz doesn't indict anyone in the Bush Administration. This looks like a major DNC propaganda campaign, and I find it interesting that crazy Howard Dean said he "wouldn't accept the prosecutor's decision" if Fitz doesn't indict anyone in the Bush Admin. This is a very strange Clintonesque case. I liked Washington politics more before the Klintoons showed up in Washington.


98 posted on 10/26/2005 12:38:23 AM PDT by carl in alaska (Blog blog bloggin' on heaven's door.....Kerry's speeches are just one big snore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I'll tell you something, if Fitz does indict one or more top Bush Admin people then I will start to wonder if someone did get to him and intimidate him in some way. I rarely support conspiracy theories, but if he goes after the Bushies really hard here then I would start to seriously consider that possibility. I find it hard to believe that Rove or Libby, following the advice of top attorneys, could have actually committed perjury or obstruction.

There's a strange story in the LA Times too about Fitz's people questioning Wilson's neighbors again TODAY about whether they knew that Plame worked for the CIA. That's strikes me as very odd--either Fitz toying with the MSM or perhaps Fitz is nervous about a weak indictment that he's filing. I hope he's just trying to confuse the MSM.

99 posted on 10/26/2005 12:46:56 AM PDT by carl in alaska (Blog blog bloggin' on heaven's door.....Kerry's speeches are just one big snore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska
I rarely support conspiracy theories, but if he goes after the Bushies really hard here then I would start to seriously consider that possibility.

This is it:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1508146/posts

Is Valerie Plame the new Deep Throat?

100 posted on 10/26/2005 12:49:39 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Gloria Borger is Andrea Mitchell on Peyote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson