To: american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...
Since marriage is thought to be an outmoded patriarchal institution, taking on gender roles within a same-sex marriage is to be avoided. In other words, same-sex marriage is good as long as it is not like real marriage, which is bad, because it is patriarchal and oppressive and involves sex roles. Next phase of the homosexual agenda - rid the world of "couples". They've destroyed so many good English words by their deceiptful lifestyle - "gay" used to mean fun loving, "rainbow" used to be a symbol from God that He would never inlict another flood ... now "couple" must be banished, according to their agenda. Where does it end?
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
40 posted on
10/25/2005 4:06:11 PM PDT by
NYer
(“Socialism is the religion people get when they lose their religion")
To: NYer
Where does it end?It had better end now. Do not allow the coopting of the language. Words and phrases matter.
41 posted on
10/25/2005 4:09:32 PM PDT by
Bahbah
(Tony Schaffer is a hero)
To: NYer
Where does it end?
Sadly, I think we both know the answer to that.
42 posted on
10/25/2005 4:19:31 PM PDT by
visualops
(www.visualops.com)
To: NYer
Since marriage is thought to be an outmoded patriarchal institution, taking on gender roles within a same-sex marriage is to be avoided. In other words, same-sex marriage is good as long as it is not like real marriage, which is bad, because it is patriarchal and oppressive and involves sex roles. However difficult it may be to believe, many leading feminist "thinkers" are espousing absolute equality of the sexes. For example, they're looking forward to the day when both men and women share gestation. No, I'm not making this up. I read it in "Architects of the Culture of Death."
54 posted on
10/26/2005 4:56:49 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson