Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stephen Spruiell....An Open Letter to the Press: Tell the Truth About Joseph Wilson
NRO Media Blog ^ | 10/25/05 | Stephen Spruiell

Posted on 10/25/2005 6:27:17 AM PDT by StoneGiant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 10/25/2005 6:27:19 AM PDT by StoneGiant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant
Sorry folks, this one is O-V-E-R.

And we didn't win.

Joe Wilson (and now the wife as well) are rapidly becoming the new liberal icons of whistle-blowing virtue (re: "Is Valerie Plame the new Deep Throat?", The American Thinker. And this from a conservative website). The myth has been spun and perpetuated ad nauseum through the liberal press for months now and there is no going back. The impending indictments from Fitzgerald, whether legitimate or not, will seal the deal. Exoneration and vindication for Republicans, after a proper trial, will be immaterial as the fairy tale will have been fixed in the public's mind by that point.

2 posted on 10/25/2005 6:48:32 AM PDT by liberty_lvr (Those who stand for nothing fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberty_lvr

Pardon me if I don't buy in to your negativism. There's always time to blast this stupid liberal ploy.


3 posted on 10/25/2005 6:58:00 AM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: liberty_lvr

" Joe Wilson (and now the wife as well) are rapidly becoming the new liberal icons of whistle-blowing virtue"


That's too strong, I think. Does anybody really think that Wilson has been straightforward in spinning the situation or that his motivation has been what's good for the U.S. in speaking tour? From the moment he went public his role has been political.

On the other hand it looks like he was factually correct that we did not evidence of Iraq attempting to buy Uranium from Niger - but even he admits that it might have happened.

The bottom line is we don't have evidence of WMD justification for entering the war and the sooner we de-focus on WMD's or terrorism justifying the war and focus on the humanitarian reasons for the war and reality that we are there and cannot afford to leave prematurely the better off we will be.


4 posted on 10/25/2005 7:00:21 AM PDT by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: liberty_lvr
I wouldn't annoit Joe Wilson so soon, though. You're forgetting that the power of the MSM has dropped with the rise of New Media, especially the public Internet. Everyone knows Wilson's chequered past and the New Media won't let Americans ignore it.
5 posted on 10/25/2005 7:02:02 AM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: liberty_lvr

"(re: "Is Valerie Plame the new Deep Throat?""

Let's ask former President Clinton.

Sorry, that just came out.


6 posted on 10/25/2005 7:05:16 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: liberty_lvr
It is my understanding The American Thinker article sugggested that holdovers at the CIA, the liberal media, and the Wilson's fabricated lies to subvert a Republican President. Here's a snip from your referenced article:

Today’s media assault has all the earmarks of a CIA disinformation operation, just the sort of thing Plame and her colleagues are professionally trained to conduct. While it has layers of deception and coverup, the pattern seems clear enough. Dozens of commentators have now identified the many lies told by Joe Wilson over the past two years, with the quiet backing of Plame and her CIA backers. Notice that the CIA could have exposed Wilson’s fabrications at any time in the last two years. It did not, and by its deliberate silence has allowed those stories to flower into the partisan assault we see today.As Howard Fineman wrote a few weeks ago, the now infamous outing of Valerie Plame isn’t primarily an issue of law. It’s about a lot of other things, like: the ongoing war between the CIA and the vice president’s office. The spookocracy has a very personal itch to want to destroy George W. Bush and Dick Cheney: It is facing a purge to finally get rid of entire layers of incompetents and saboteurs, revealed by the terrorist attacks on 9/11 and the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

7 posted on 10/25/2005 7:12:22 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Quilla; All
Oh, and about that failure to find WMD's in Irag, may I recommend some excellent reading.
8 posted on 10/25/2005 7:15:39 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
No problem; I hope you're right (no pun intended - you wouldn't be here if you weren't)!

Seriously, as much as we enjoy watching the Old Media sink into oblivion around here, they are still a loud voice in the American wilderness. My fear is that the loud trumpeting of the MSM, should indictments be forthcoming, will garner the interest of those who do not follow politics beyond the evening news. I think just the whiff of scandal will be enough to slowly bolster the Deanster's new talking point that we are suffering through a "climate of corruption" within this administration.

Remember, it's not whether the implications are true, it's the seriouness of the charges that count...

9 posted on 10/25/2005 7:19:49 AM PDT by liberty_lvr (Those who stand for nothing fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

The liberals are still stuck on Watergate and Vietnam. They view all of reality through the prism of the 60's.


10 posted on 10/25/2005 7:19:56 AM PDT by hang 'em (hang'em's 12th Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Give Good Advice to the RAT Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

Ah, the mistaken assumption that the liberal media has a conscience. They don't.


11 posted on 10/25/2005 7:29:53 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Got me!

You're right, I misrepresented the article referenced because the title seemed to bolster my point so well.

Nevertheless, there is no denying that the liberal press is attempting to paint Joe & Val as victims here, poor civil servants whose simple lives were ruined by the evil machinations of the Machiavellian Rove when Big Joe challenged the WMD war argument.

12 posted on 10/25/2005 7:30:06 AM PDT by liberty_lvr (Those who stand for nothing fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

Why do I hate "Open Letters"?


13 posted on 10/25/2005 7:31:37 AM PDT by devane617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

"Let's ask former President Clinton."

Seriously now, are we to believe that Clinton could have determined depth beyond two inches?


14 posted on 10/25/2005 7:47:34 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (How the hell could Bush have passed up a Ronnie Earle to appoint a Harriet Miers to the Court?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

Well, something's up. Today, almost 2 1/2 years after he aired that serial liar's story, the Wash Post's Walter Pincus, finally concedes he's a showboat and finally concedes the SSCI found most of his story to be false. (Pincus still lies about the uranium buying story) but it is progress. And I have to wonder why he finally conceded his playmate is not credible.


15 posted on 10/25/2005 7:50:10 AM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB; StoneGiant
On the other hand it looks like he was factually correct that we did not evidence of Iraq attempting to buy Uranium from Niger

Actually, Iraqi trade contacts with Niger are public information that even Wilson has acknowledged. As others have noted, Iraq was after chickpeas, goats, or uranium. Take your pick.

Wilson never mentions those trade contacts unless pressed, because they don't fit his overall case, which is that France didn't, wouldn't, couldn't, deal in contraband uranium.

It would be interesting to know where Libya got its yellow-cake for its nuclear program.

16 posted on 10/25/2005 8:24:28 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hang 'em
The liberals are still stuck on Watergate and Vietnam

Win with Spin

17 posted on 10/25/2005 8:25:05 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: marron

Me:"On the other hand it looks like he was factually correct that we did not evidence of Iraq attempting to buy Uranium from Niger"

marron: "Actually, Iraqi trade contacts with Niger are public information that even Wilson has acknowledged. As others have noted, Iraq was after chickpeas, goats, or uranium. Take your pick.

Wilson never mentions those trade contacts unless pressed, because they don't fit his overall case, which is that France didn't, wouldn't, couldn't, deal in contraband uranium. "

Our two statements are not contradictory. I agree Wilson is playing a slimey political game. But the fact remains that he was factually correct that we did not have evidence of of Iraq attempting to buy Uranium from Niger and thus we would have been smarter to not go after him.


18 posted on 10/25/2005 8:29:17 AM PDT by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: liberty_lvr; Jim Robinson
this one...over...we didn't win...

I agree that the media reports sure don't look good for our team.

Maybe Fitzgerald will fool everyone with an indictment for a renegade CIA operation, but I don't think so.

No one that I've read has mentioned Wilson or Plame or other CIA types having to reappear at the grand jury. I guess Fitz could be getting inside info from Goss, but somehow I think the leaks are intentional to prepare the nation for what's taking going to take place in the administration.

He could also come back with no indictments at all....but that doesn't explain the leaks which do appear to be intentional.

19 posted on 10/25/2005 8:40:03 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

bttt


20 posted on 10/25/2005 9:13:57 AM PDT by Christian4Bush ("A gov't big enough to give you all you want is a gov' big enough to take all you have." G.Ford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson