The big question here is why isn't the Brit government taking the lead in this? He's their elected official and yet the U. S. Senate is the entity that came up with all of the facts? Why didn't investigators in Britain come up with some of this information during his civil case?
Makes one wonder what Mr. Galloway's real name is now.
Something like Abu Mohammed Jihad, perhaps?
MooseLimb women are do not marry infidels and live for very long.
In December, Mr Galloway won £150,000 [$280,000 USD] in libel damages from the Daily Telegraph over its separate claims he had received money from Saddam's regime. The paper is currently awaiting the result of its appeal against that ruling.
[Obviously, the case is still to be settled. As for the information, the British press hasn't said too much.]
Because Galloway wasn't the only one.
At a guess, because Galloway was a long term Labour MP and as such knows were at least some of the bodies are buried. If you were Blair, would you want him to have his day in court over this?
<< The big question here is why isn't the Brit government taking the lead in this? He's their elected official and yet the U. S. Senate is the entity that came up with all of the facts? Why didn't investigators in Britain come up with some of this information during his civil case? >>
In case you haven't noticed, the brits are among the Western World's most cravenly-cowardly appeasers of terrorists and kow=tow-ers to those, like the execrable Galloway, that succor and profit from terrorists.