Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Times: Cheney First Disclosed CIA Official's Name
newsmax.com ^ | Monday, Oct. 24, 2005 10:24 p.m. EDT

Posted on 10/24/2005 9:05:41 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 last
To: edweena
If there was no crime, why was the information leaked?

The law is that a covert under covert agent whos cover is blown is against the law.

Where was she covert? Where was she undercover? She wasn't! Why the information was leaked, only her husband Joe Wilson knows! He went out of his way to set up this White House by lying his sorry @ss off. Don't put it past him to leak his wife then trump up her roll with a willing media that also hates this White House.

161 posted on 10/25/2005 11:53:08 AM PDT by Bommer (TEXANS - VOTE NOV 8TH FOR PROPOSITION 2 - THE MARRIAGE PROTECTION AMENDMENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
For the one millionth time

"millionth" --- here's supposing you exaggerate quite a lot.

You and the facts..........baloney.

162 posted on 10/25/2005 12:36:58 PM PDT by beyond the sea (Gloria Borger is Andrea Mitchell on Peyote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Howlin said: "Well, I guess Judge Wright and the Arkansas Bar was wrong then. "

Would you have a link to a report that is contrary to what I described? I have read several reports of the Arkansas Bar ruling but I don't see an accusation that Clinton denied having sex with Paula Jones.

My recollection is that Paula claimed that Clinton invited her to a hotel room and then unexpectedly exposed himself and asked her to "kiss it". Though there may have been slight physical contact, I am aware of no party who has claimed that it constituted "sex" by any definition whatever. Nor am I aware of any instance in which Clinton is reported to have lied with regard to having had sex with Paula Jones.

163 posted on 10/25/2005 3:00:20 PM PDT by William Tell (Put the RKBA on the California Constitution - Volunteer through rkba.members.sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

I liked you to the articles on CNN at the time.


164 posted on 10/25/2005 3:16:41 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Howlin said: "I linked you to the articles on CNN at the time."

And I have read that article. Twice. There are 24 paragraphs by my count. Perhaps you would be so kind as to tell me which of those paragraphs support your claim that Clinton lied about having sex with Paula Jones.

In fact, if it's not too much trouble, could you post the relevant paragraph or paragraphs?

165 posted on 10/25/2005 3:50:39 PM PDT by William Tell (Put the RKBA on the California Constitution - Volunteer through rkba.members.sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Bush_Democrat
"Be careful what you wish for"

I think Wilson is the central bad buy, his wife and many others dupes. I want to find out who they all are.


This whole thing is very serious, it could have gone close to a Kennedy type conspiracy, they had already crossed the line. All involved are either dupes, traitors or hapless participants caught in the crossfire.

Wolf
166 posted on 10/25/2005 8:32:39 PM PDT by RunningWolf (tag line limbo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: richconklin

i hear you. but chenny has not hurt bush and bush thinks the world. of him. delay is the master sargent keeping the troops in line. allen will get his chance . ride this out first then on to the next move.


167 posted on 10/25/2005 8:44:07 PM PDT by fantom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

But if she wasn't covert, why all the nonsense of leaking to Robert Novak? Why didn't Scott McClellan simply give the facts to the press straight up?


168 posted on 10/25/2005 10:09:01 PM PDT by edweena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: edweena
Its the Democraps desperate attempt to make something out of nothing. Go to Rush Limbaugh site and listen to his show today. Even he says this is nothing. A reckless prosecutor can look into nothing and indite like its something (see Ronnie Earle)
169 posted on 10/25/2005 11:59:44 PM PDT by Bommer (TEXANS - VOTE NOV 8TH FOR PROPOSITION 2 - THE MARRIAGE PROTECTION AMENDMENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson