My position on this topic has nothing to do with Miers withdrawing. I mentioned, in passing, that Rush was originally against the nomination. I never said that he called for a withdrawal - I don't know why you guys keep trying to make the two of them equivalent.
Regardless, he was against it originally as I have pointed out that he was in his own words, "disapointed" and that the nomination was made from weakness.
No one disputes that.
I don't know why you guys keep trying to make the two of them equivalent.
Probably because you're confused by your own posts. I have no problem understanding your posts or the position you have taken since "day one". Your position hasn't changed, mine hasn't either (in fact I still remain open-minded and welcome the hearings), Rush's has, he's finally come to his senses and realizes that your position is based on pure self-involved emotion alone.