No one disputes that.
I don't know why you guys keep trying to make the two of them equivalent.
Probably because you're confused by your own posts. I have no problem understanding your posts or the position you have taken since "day one". Your position hasn't changed, mine hasn't either (in fact I still remain open-minded and welcome the hearings), Rush's has, he's finally come to his senses and realizes that your position is based on pure self-involved emotion alone.
Huh? You and two others said that I was wrong when I wrote that Rush was originally against the nomination. I never said anything about Rush wanting Miers to withdraw. You guys introduced that, not me.
Me: "The fact that Rush was originally against the nomination speaks volumes."
You and two others: "You are wrong, Rush was split from day one."
I post quotes from Rush on day one where he said he was disappointed with the pick and claimed that it was made from weakness.
You and two others: "See you are wrong! He wants the process to go to the end"
Me: "I never said Rush wanted the nomination withdrawn."
You: "You are confused"