Unless the designer appears at the meeting how are they going to prove it
"Unless the designer appears at the meeting how are they going to prove it"
Well, I suppose they are trying to figure out how to prove it as we speak. After all, ID is just theory for now ... not a fact.
They can't "prove it" anymore than a Darwinist can prove his theory. What they say is the evidence points to a higher intelligence having designed what we see.
Now one can argue that it's not necessary, that spontaneous generation actually is real, but they can't prove that either.
"Unless the designer appears at the meeting how are they going to prove it"
I suppose the "missing link" shows up at all the evolutionists' meetings.