[ThirstyMan]

Unless the designer appears at the meeting how are they going to prove it

They can't "prove it" anymore than a Darwinist can prove his theory. What they say is the evidence points to a higher intelligence having designed what we see.

Now one can argue that it's not necessary, that spontaneous generation actually is real, but they can't prove that either.

[chrisg2001]

Please can you post a link to the _positive_ evidence that we can see that points to a higher intelligence designing what we can see.