[Right Wing Professor]

Life gives birth to life, intelligence to intelligence and until you can prove/show otherwise then all the proposed change-over-time solutions to life's origins are wishful thinking.

Proof by assertion.

And ironically the attempts at starting life up are a model for what you think you're disproving: intelligent design.

Lovely variant on a standard creationist canard.

Creationist: evolution has never been proven. You can't even duplicate it in a lab.

Scientist: sure I can, look, I grow this population under selective pressure, it changes, that's evolution.

Creationist: but you did it in a lab. It's a designed experiment! That's noi evolution, it's ID!

[ThirstyMan]

First of all what is a creationist?

I do believe in a Creator. Does that make me a creationist?

Secondly, if you look at how jennyp answered my questions, she dialogued with me and lit a path for me to follow. I did not get labeled and dismissed by her as I did with you.

If this is a quest for truth, as I believe it is, then why not hold back on the labeling?